IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Sun, 08 May 2016 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1A612B01E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2016 01:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYBCwmIGSsWO for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2016 01:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7D7512B00F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 May 2016 01:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AUAgDP8S5X/xUHmMZeHAGCTyErVYEDuQQBDYF2hhACgRs4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4REAQMSG0wSAQwJARRWJgEEAQ0NGogJAaMNml0BAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBARiGIYkMgymCLgWYIgGLYIQ7h1aFQY87HgEBQoIFG4FLiCgBfgEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A2AUAgDP8S5X/xUHmMZeHAGCTyErVYEDuQQBDYF2hhACgRs4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4REAQMSG0wSAQwJARRWJgEEAQ0NGogJAaMNml0BAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBARiGIYkMgymCLgWYIgGLYIQ7h1aFQY87HgEBQoIFG4FLiCgBfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,594,1454994000"; d="scan'208,217";a="174106368"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2016 04:00:13 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 08 May 2016 04:00:12 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:00:10 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>, "jefftant.ietf@gmail.com" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10
Thread-Index: AdGo/U3+4AL82e7jR2aWFbDCuohAPg==
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 08:00:10 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751DC222@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751DC222AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/0N8PG7v3RThs4rYGWZrCwKsLy-o>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 08:00:33 -0000

Alia, Jeff,

I am the designed Gen-ART reviewer of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10. I notice that this is a RTGWG document and is on the agenda of the telechat on 5/19, but no IETF Last Call was conducted. Can you shortly explain the reasons? Did you intentionally decide to skip IETF LC, or is this an omission? Another question - this document has a strong operational topic - did it go through an OPS-DIR review?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email