IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-12

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Sun, 04 February 2018 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CAF126DCA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bjz4JCZ-aOgD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:12:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98ADD1241F8 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:12:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.115]) by resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id iRa9eTDvvve36iRaBeO9EY; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:12:15 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([65.96.206.41]) by resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id iRa9eK3qYIZBtiRaAeRsVG; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:12:15 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w14LCDYK000938; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:12:13 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id w14LCCxp000935; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:12:12 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Thomas Stach <thomass.stach@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip.all@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <d8a18070-83c1-e5fa-8b5b-fa47fbed11cc@gmail.com> (thomass.stach@gmail.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:12:12 -0500
Message-ID: <87shaga28j.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGtHio4+szlPjUo9D3ugFZU7YkIjTef+nZgxJgywPT4W7hOvgacEmfmVvWERdeFulochgk81Hb+rUAwsZo0+THSMw0Yu/H42EsoIjfWwX4R4DoVorjVf xKs8PQRZ+Za98QmSzA3tOIMfwqwy+4Ua5pYiOBMZ0kVp/F35VKTtcFk05QqNxVTA/qcmkjum3LG6YGZdveO3A6P5ugD+9EMkZ+i1Psl6TsLGoCIhs/ZP8l3m DnX6V4+xerOCMRVziQGLaFLnmaT5Qz9Gm1MhfAKqbFUeRYxQ/jVoHoZUZh8t1wbT
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WY3l2_fWyUTRg5LBuorAQ3z3NU4>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:12:18 -0000

Thomas Stach <thomass.stach@gmail.com> writes:
>> * The definition of application/trickle-ice-sdpfrag describes the use of
>> "a=charset" as an attribute, but the grammar of sdpfrag in section 9
>> does not permit that attribute.

> The grammar allows for using extension attributes.

Yes.

>> Figure 11 seems to be incorrect -- since Alice is using Half-Trickle
>> ICE, all her candidates are sent in the INVITE, and she shouldn't send
>> any INFO requests.  But an INFO request from Alice is shown.

> No, that is correct. The INFO from Alice acknowledges the receipt of the 
> 183 and stop retransmissions (see section 4.3.2)

Yes, I was wrong there.

>> I don't know the practice regarding the overall grammar of SDP, but
>> the grammar shown here is very rigid regarding the order of fields in
>> <session-level-fields> and in <trickle-ice-attribute-fields>.  If this
>> rigidity is not intended, there should be some notation on the grammar
>> to show this.

> I don't see any benefit in making it less rigid and I'm somewhat 
> reluctant to change this at this point of the process.

I see no objection to making the field order rigid.  I just wanted to
make sure that the given grammar matched your understanding/intention.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email