Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 30 August 2016 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5D512D134; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsPXsz35iC4H; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82872127077; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06B82CC9B; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:24:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j66G__c2ttkJ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:24:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FDE2CC40; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:24:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3783E1D8-1624-4823-BFD1-48D544FE1E98"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <6600b98c-e677-d198-4e0f-68fff3ee8e3c@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:24:33 +0300
Message-Id: <4C3AB846-15D8-4211-95D3-9593AA5F21F6@piuha.net>
References: <0371ee99-778c-5ded-0c31-3c6d8d6b55c7@nostrum.com> <6600b98c-e677-d198-4e0f-68fff3ee8e3c@bogus.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WhWc18RRXfljYEcNCswWrhhl3Jw>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:24:39 -0000

Robert — thanks for the review (again)! And thanks everyone for a document that to me seems quite useful and necessary.

I do have a similar concern as Robert did, however, in making sure that the change to 7344 is properly highlighted. Joel, did you have a plan on how to make that happen? I haven’t seen any IETF list traffic on the last call since June…

For what it is worth, I have today reviewed both draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds and RFC 7344, and personally find the recommendations and actions reasonable.

Jari