IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-12

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Mon, 15 February 2021 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901503A0FC7; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:54:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id old_J5iVpp_8; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (mx2.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B763A0F9D; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 90697600004E; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:54:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2617E600004D; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:54:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:54:20 +0100
Message-Id: <602A36BA020000A10003F01A@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.0
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:54:18 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: tievens@cisco.com, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <161317387496.31377.7416127213693172983@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161317387496.31377.7416127213693172983@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/XSRwKyGg8LQPFEPp8mHM-dDmsy8>
Subject: [Gen-art] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:54:30 -0000

>>> Tim Evens via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> schrieb am 13.02.2021 um 00:51
in
Nachricht <161317387496.31377.7416127213693172983@ietfa.amsl.com>:

...
> Are the backslashes required here? It seems that many examples have them 
> when
> there is a value and the closing tag is not on the same line.  For example:
...
>            <associations‑address>192.0.2.1\
>            </associations‑address>

I think the backslash is no syntactic element IN XML; it's probably an
indoicator that those lines should be ONE for XML input.
Some XML lines are just long...

Regards,
Ulrich

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email