IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sat, 01 October 2011 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BF221F98AD; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 06:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdtYLSie90Z5; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 06:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD33621F98AC; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 06:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so3213298bka.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:content-language:thread-index; bh=lPw5ANlR9RbakMArtLuRNAtgeuA8wEg4dOZQ9/zZp3M=; b=rRRPx+zkujBf/eMTnDzMaRNiSXpnpMGVPU/4/mubq7q/7DvSepdrIPKPqQsqk3EFX7 QrbjXwQKaxu6y6gHvM6hWa7qSoKQSM43+uT1rh4LLJOSTqFvzVbXPeVhWMKh7PIoLRYx yjrp4zvSa9c4s7njb6K7KYFSg9crFwD0LiboY=
Received: by 10.223.62.8 with SMTP id v8mr11190254fah.43.1317475997871; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windows8d787f9 ([109.64.200.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w14sm11574356fae.13.2011.10.01.06.33.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:30:55 +0300
Message-ID: <4e87169c.8e2bdf0a.01d9.20f0@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BB_01CC8057.95F03800"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-language: en-us
Thread-index: AcyAPlbBDH5dlWMQStOjcRPEol3dZw==
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, 'IETF-Discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:30:23 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date: 2011-10-1

IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-10

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC.


 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

I noticed that the major change from RFC 3462 in the current version is to
remove requirement that multipart/report not be contained in anything. The
changes appear in appendix B which is to be removed in the published
document.  I think that it will be better to have the change from RFC 3462
be part of the main text and also discuss what are the backward
interoperability issues if any.

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email