Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 23 April 2013 20:16 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7227D21F9421 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykzIlr4vROJ9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F41D21F9412 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2522CC55; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:16:35 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhK1M1_l0yb2; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:16:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9922CC56; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:16:35 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <8ABB8DFE-3352-4B08-B789-34FA14E2E89D@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:16:35 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1C353C8C-41F3-4677-AF52-CEE50C593583@piuha.net>
References: <103vdbw51iyar5bmktcblq8b.1366746863437@email.android.com> <8ABB8DFE-3352-4B08-B789-34FA14E2E89D@microsoft.com>
To: "Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:16:37 -0000
Thanks, all. Jari On Apr 23, 2013, at 11:11 PM, "Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com> wrote: > Elwyn - > > Yes, to be clear I will be introducing another draft shortly (in IDR) to cover the top number of both ranges, this is the path WG chairs and AD ok'd... > > Cheers, > > Jon > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:55 PM, "Elwyn Davies" <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> wrote: > >> hi. >> >> Yes. Jon and I exchanged email and he changed the IANA instructions to be more commanding. >> >> We also discussed the fact that the reservation of the top AS number is not actually in any RFC as I thought this might have been a good place to do it. Apparently the WG thinks otherwise so we left that dog sleeping quietly. >> >> Otherwise it is fine by me. >> >> Regards, >> Elwyn >> >> Sent from my ASUS Pad >> >> Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: >> >>> Jari and Elwyn: >>> >>> I thought Jon had completed the changes to address Elwyn's comments. >>> If not, he's will to get more comments. >>> >>> Doc-Shepherd/co-chair Sue, >>> >>> Sue >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:19 PM >>> To: Elwyn Davies; Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com; Susan Hares >>> Cc: <gen-art@ietf.org> Team >>> Subject: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status >>> >>> Elwyn, Sue, Jon: >>> >>> We are talking about this draft on Thursday evening at the IESG. I see that >>> there was a review and discussion earlier in the year. Thank you for the >>> reviews and responses! The Gen-ART reviews are very important for me, as >>> they enable me to spend time on a number of topics and not just the IESG >>> document reviews. >>> >>> But I had a question. Do you all feel that everything raised in the >>> discussion has been properly addressed, and everyone is happy moving >>> forward? >>> >>> Jari >>> >>>
- Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservati… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservati… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservati… Jon Mitchell (GNS)
- Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservati… Jari Arkko