IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status

"Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com> Tue, 23 April 2013 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B01D21F93B7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQgE08w1i-bF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-sn2-obe.outbound.o365filtering.com (na01-sn2-obe.ptr.o365filtering.com [157.55.158.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF5821F93AA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BL2SR01CA101.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com (10.255.109.146) by BL2SR01MB605.namsdf01.sdf.exchangelabs.com (10.255.109.167) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.687.4; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:43 +0000
Received: from SN2FFOFD002.ffo.gbl (157.55.158.30) by BL2SR01CA101.outlook.office365.com (10.255.109.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.692.0 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:43 +0000
Received: from hybrid.exchange.microsoft.com (131.107.1.17) by SN2FFOFD002.mail.o365filtering.com (10.111.201.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.687.1 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:43 +0000
Received: from df-h14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) by DF-G14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.1; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:19 +0000
Received: from DFM-DB3MBX15-07.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (10.166.18.225) by DF-H14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.1; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:19 -0700
Received: from DFM-DB3MBX15-08.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (10.166.18.226) by DFM-DB3MBX15-07.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (10.166.18.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.25; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:17 -0700
Received: from DFM-DB3MBX15-08.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.12.113]) by DFM-DB3MBX15-08.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.12.113]) with mapi id 15.00.0620.020; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:16 -0700
From: "Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com>
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status
Thread-Index: AQHOQFxZ1wOteIWZ1UK5aZnw7nzZRpjkPLNE
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:16 +0000
Message-ID: <8ABB8DFE-3352-4B08-B789-34FA14E2E89D@microsoft.com>
References: <103vdbw51iyar5bmktcblq8b.1366746863437@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <103vdbw51iyar5bmktcblq8b.1366746863437@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.1.17; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(13464002)(24454001)(377454001)(199002)(189002)(51704004)(23726002)(4396001)(81542001)(44976003)(46102001)(54316002)(56776001)(56816002)(76482001)(47976001)(49866001)(47736001)(51856001)(81342001)(50986001)(50466001)(36756002)(47446002)(74502001)(69226001)(80022001)(65816001)(6806003)(33656001)(79102001)(63696002)(74662001)(46406003)(53806001)(77982001)(59766001)(31966008)(16406001)(20776003)(47776003)(54356001)(22906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2SR01MB605; H:hybrid.exchange.microsoft.com; RD:mail1.exchange.microsoft.com; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 08252193F3
X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-b1291ffc-369c-4c2a-9225-e2908f70a426.microsoft.com
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Jon Mitchell (GNS)" <Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:11:46 -0000

Elwyn -

Yes, to be clear I will be introducing another draft shortly (in IDR) to cover the top number of both ranges, this is the path WG chairs and AD ok'd...

Cheers,

Jon

On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:55 PM, "Elwyn Davies" <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> wrote:

> hi.
> 
> Yes.  Jon and I exchanged email and he changed the IANA instructions  to be more commanding. 
> 
> We also discussed the fact that the reservation of the top AS number is not actually in any RFC as I thought this might have been a good place to do it.  Apparently the WG thinks otherwise so we left that dog sleeping quietly.
> 
> Otherwise it is fine by me.
> 
> Regards,
> Elwyn
> 
> Sent from my ASUS Pad
> 
> Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
>> Jari and Elwyn:
>> 
>> I thought Jon had completed the changes to address Elwyn's comments.  
>> If not, he's will to get more comments. 
>> 
>> Doc-Shepherd/co-chair Sue,
>> 
>> Sue 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:19 PM
>> To: Elwyn Davies; Jon.Mitchell@microsoft.com; Susan Hares
>> Cc: <gen-art@ietf.org> Team
>> Subject: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation gen-art review status
>> 
>> Elwyn, Sue, Jon:
>> 
>> We are talking about this draft on Thursday evening at the IESG. I see that
>> there was a review and discussion earlier in the year. Thank you for the
>> reviews and responses! The Gen-ART reviews are very important for me, as
>> they enable me to spend time on a number of topics and not just the IESG
>> document reviews.
>> 
>> But I had a question. Do you all feel that everything raised in the
>> discussion has been properly addressed, and everyone is happy moving
>> forward?
>> 
>> Jari
>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email