Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Thu, 31 August 2006 15:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobO-0002cw-VI; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:10 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobN-0002aG-Vg for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:09 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr ([82.236.136.93]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobM-0002D6-Hk for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:09 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k7VFaxOQ014078; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (dupont@localhost) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) with ESMTP id k7VFav2c014075; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200608311536.k7VFav2c014075@tao.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Black_David@emc.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:04:52 EDT. <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B672A7@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:57 +0200
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, jpink@microsoft.com, lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de, recio@us.ibm.com, paul.culley@hp.com, hemal@broadcom.com
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   As you suggested, I did contact the IESG, specifically the Security
   ADs, about IKEv1 vs. IKEv2, and the verdict is to stick with IKEv1 as
   profiled by RFC 3723 for iSCSI so that iSCSI and RDDP use the same
   profile of IPsec.  If/when RFC 3723 is updated, all the protocols that
   use it will be uniformly affected.  Text will be added to the next
   version of the draft to explain this.
   
=> IMHO this is a good solution...

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art