Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Thu, 31 August 2006 15:37 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobO-0002cw-VI; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:10 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobN-0002aG-Vg for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:09 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr ([82.236.136.93]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIobM-0002D6-Hk for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:09 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k7VFaxOQ014078; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (dupont@localhost) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) with ESMTP id k7VFav2c014075; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200608311536.k7VFav2c014075@tao.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Black_David@emc.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:04:52 EDT. <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B672A7@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:57 +0200
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, jpink@microsoft.com, lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de, recio@us.ibm.com, paul.culley@hp.com, hemal@broadcom.com
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
In your previous mail you wrote: As you suggested, I did contact the IESG, specifically the Security ADs, about IKEv1 vs. IKEv2, and the verdict is to stick with IKEv1 as profiled by RFC 3723 for iSCSI so that iSCSI and RDDP use the same profile of IPsec. If/when RFC 3723 is updated, all the protocols that use it will be uniformly affected. Text will be added to the next version of the draft to explain this. => IMHO this is a good solution... Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt Francis Dupont
- RE: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt Black_David
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt Francis Dupont