Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-15.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 30 October 2014 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CC81A004E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KiMm5ybDEQK for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DD41A0047 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0303F2CD0E; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:38:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LGMC4b7y_tm; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:38:39 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259002CC4D; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:38:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8BB5ED35-3F64-4553-8DE8-4B330960F3B1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF6289044A9@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:38:38 +0200
Message-Id: <129B2B28-2CBE-4495-AB9B-786FB3BCB14A@piuha.net>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF6289044A9@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/br9IVFFL49r9MUfieNqRvRPyApo
Cc: "draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls.all@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-15.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:38:46 -0000

Thanks for the review, Suresh. Authors, can you take Suresh’s comments into account? Thanks.

Jari

On 29 Oct 2014, at 06:11, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html)
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-15.txt
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2013/10/28
> IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30
> 
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Historic RFC, but I 
> have some comments you may wish to address.
> 
> * Section 7.1
> 
> The Length field of the IP address TLV in case the IP address is IPv6 is 
> not defined. It should be defined to be 18 (2 bytes for address family 
> and 16 bytes for the IPv6 address)
> 
> 
> * Address family reference
> 
> The IANA registry at 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/address-family-numbers.xhtml 
> is a much better reference for address families than the currently 
> referred RFC3232 that does not contain any of the relevant information.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art