[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-jones-avt-audio-t38-05

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Thu, 05 January 2006 14:34 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EuWCh-0000dQ-D7; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:34:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EuWCe-0000d8-89 for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:34:58 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21046 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:33:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EuWIK-0004TB-9r for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:49 -0500
Received: from s73602 (unknown[65.104.224.98]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2006010514342401300cj3t0e>; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:34:35 +0000
Message-ID: <0f5e01c61204$fd0748c0$0500a8c0@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
References: <200601042052.1eUn7ptI3NZFmn0@bluebird.mail.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:33:12 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'Magnus Westerlund' <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, 'General Area Review Team' <gen-art@ietf.org>, 'Colin Perkins' <csp@csperkins.org>, 'Hiroshi Tamura' <tamura@cs.ricoh.co.jp>
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-jones-avt-audio-t38-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, Allison,

> I believe it is not necessary to add up-to-date boilerplate to an old
> returning document.   The boilerplate serves during the IETF work on the
> document prior to the IESG review period; at worst, I see us as being
> in a grey area with this one.  If someone in the IESG decides they
> really wanted it to be there, they can let me know on the telechat
> tomorrow.
>
> [Spencer, you think I didn't consider this?]

:-)

(To make this a tiny bit more on-topic,) I understand that we're bouncing 
new I-Ds for old boilerplate at submission time, and didn't know how the 
IESG was treating boilerplate for returning documents. Thanks for the 
clarification.

Spencer 


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art