[Gen-art] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 07 October 2016 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFCB129712 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0E4lzU5WrInr for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61F31296E0 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbwibq31D8GkCsbxIbr6ET; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:20 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.16.37.18]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbxHby4A4JmjpsbxHbXFjT; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:20 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u97KfIxF030776; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u97KfI4N030773; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-restconf.all@ietf.org
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
Message-ID: <87wphj51u9.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOZ9Q6/7nDt0h62tKpvqedCuRgxtMGgg3UgcLhvLRahkh9OVu/wQgBO/bvhJ+a4Pc8YAlF9OaKy0ypqeU158WBHT4+2oBVKEEPrlfEFC+7uyHG0+5MR1 T4CmYmOdT+O5f3F9K7tmPsEOLbGkcAQjS1p8twZXQl7q6A9B6xbkNHXr78NhcIxlfUnPJV6wTS0AxnBXl/9g4Pix2rfBavyP44RpvYlFgFZkB/oEbzjQmPAl ohyTIJqxdDh4yST4igTksA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cpLT2UA6q64GgPLr1L5GdQ7NQ74>
Subject: [Gen-art] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:22 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
Reviewer: Dale R. Worley
Review Date: 2016-10-07
IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-03
IESG Telechat date: 2016-10-13

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.

This is a comparison of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17 against my review
for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-16.  In my opinion, all review items
have been resolved.  I am repeating the following item because its
resolution is by recognizing an error in the referenced RFC 6415, which
perhaps ought to be considered by the IESG:

    The draft makes use of reltive URLs as values of the href
    attribute of the Link element in XRD documents (RFC 6415).
    Relative links are not usually considered to be "URIs", but rather
    "URI-references" (RFC 3986 section 4.1), and RFC 6415 uses "URI"
    consistently, not "URI-reference".  Also, all examples in RFC 6415
    show complete URIs.

Note that the above issue has been resolved with the understanding
that RFC 6415 is incorrectly stated, and it seems to have always been
intended to allow relative URLs in XRD:  Compare with its source,
Extensible Resource Descriptor (XRD) Version 1.0
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/v1.0/xrd-1.0.html) sections 2.6
and 1.5.2.  This issue has been filed as erratum 4811 to RFC 6415
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4811).

Dale