[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 02:23 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EFE1A90D7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jVhKoAtJDvc for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF81B1A90AC for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v10so1671067pde.10 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dclmdmfkqCLK4FcxMVfNXUoS6WsYFQ9p2KgvopRrgjM=; b=y2Fz3eOdr5VOP91GhwY86N16Hn4uX3mohGQoS32+OeQhtKzPsAtipvFi/HNkB/iLSB +7c2SM7UtTCycZACFFCtP53pC54OR82knx9j99AIWXuLLVgy1oifC8nCvyONccWomvpq fz7CZkTfC89lgoZGlhRfsGGOodMlDQp+iXod18eqXM+bKQSmrMXEvpTPcOORDKBDEsIv KN/za2nvbvLDttlvA/SJiqqWIdd50fY8gFysVX/jk7pm8VD8xA0Q/HJT03EpoVkOYy6t jDnkHjXiSHNLscTJLljXjJOtd9hVyiullHia/72amVRJ6AZ2jl+uyLGBH1kNGzO5Sl3R eJpA==
X-Received: by 10.66.66.230 with SMTP id i6mr18988079pat.155.1421374992954; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:69e7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:69e7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oi5sm2593028pbb.7.2015.01.15.18.23.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54B87617.4030908@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:23:19 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-nottingham-safe-hint.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/d6neM2UJfKxZEeGKi6IHbixTczE>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:23:15 -0000
(sorry, repeat with corrected Subject header) I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2014-10-24 IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-18 IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22 Summary: Almost ready -------- Comment: -------- I am one of those who thinks this should not be on the standards track, but rather should just be documented to describe current practice. But that is not a Gen-ART comment. Minor issues: ------------- As the writeup says: "The IANA Considerations section is a bit sparse. It should at least name the registry it's updating for convenience of the reader."
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-nottin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-no… Jari Arkko