Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07
Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> Thu, 14 July 2011 00:24 UTC
Return-Path: <mccap@petoni.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E6111E80A5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17Qd38kHmGmB for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1E611E808D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so123397fxe.27 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.6.201 with SMTP id a9mr2505211faa.110.1310603038680; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.105.3 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [12.234.76.2]
In-Reply-To: <4E1E1CCC.304@gmail.com>
References: <CACvMsLEGS83AH9D6qmaEPZUA3Kz7tyok_Bkaw=GBXr5p-K+rcg@mail.gmail.com> <4E1E1CCC.304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:23:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CACvMsLFEWRraKRkQqMXOJ3rSC90rNxAefosGNWEWpT70by6rFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-flow-update.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:24:00 -0000
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > Would this change in Section 2 be OK for you? > > OLD: > It is > not made clear by the rule that there is an implied distinction > between stateless models (in which case no assumption may be made) > and stateful models (in which the router has explicit knowledge). > > NEW: > It is > not made clear by the rule that there is an implied distinction > between stateless models (in which there is no signaling, so no specific > assumption about the meaning of the flow label value can be made) > and stateful models (in there is signaling and the router has explicit > knowledge about the label). Yes, that clarifies things. Thanks. -Pete
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6… Pete McCann
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ie… Pete McCann