[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt

"Eric Gray" <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Fri, 27 June 2008 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BA43A67AD; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2AD3A6821 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.937
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.937 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.663, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Srjevls5sDal for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581F43A67AD for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5RKCNVe007731; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:12:23 -0500
Received: from eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.21]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:12:55 -0500
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:12:40 -0500
Message-ID: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF034FCE04@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcjYkibOhrdetDPPS2CkW6MnHKZFPg==
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: Mike Shand <mshand@cisco.com>, Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2008 20:12:55.0197 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F640CD0:01C8D892]
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
Reviewer: Eric Gray
Review Date:  27 June, 2008
IESG Telechat date: 03 July, 2008

Summary:
This draft is ready for publishing as a Proposed Standard.

Comments: 

As a point of curiosity, why were these documents not published
directly as Draft Standards?  I am reasonably sure they would
qualify.

I compared this document using rfcdiff against the original RFC
and found only minor stylistic changes (reference styles, format
of some bullets, etc.) and boiler-plate differences.  Hence this
draft is as ready to be published as was the original RFC - i.e.
- quite ready.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art