IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Tue, 01 July 2008 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3013A6BEC; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA723A6B5B for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ORI752qruBid for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619CA3A686C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,732,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="47289487"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2008 10:14:16 -0700
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m61HEGiI003952; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:14:16 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m61HEGw8015968; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:14:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.106]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:14:15 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:14:51 -0700
Message-ID: <AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB5205EDEBDA@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF034FCE04@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcjYkibOhrdetDPPS2CkW6MnHKZFPgDCwtsg
References: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF034FCE04@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "Mike Shand (mshand)" <mshand@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2008 17:14:15.0364 (UTC) FILETIME=[E3865840:01C8DB9D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1940; t=1214932456; x=1215796456; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ginsberg@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Les=20Ginsberg=20(ginsberg)=22=20<ginsberg@cisc o.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20Gen-ART=20Review=20of=20draft-ietf-isis -rfc3847bis-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=EgtL2j3wfu0vhgUrfP7sQG9xevrfOiAvcKZhtXEfFLw=; b=wl/El02xyPUphZKmOa00PAu1QJNplkGGiVztaM4uhYAZ/ILF5+8IInJQZM ron4F5D93o7CxsWWHJirdAAbeTZKnDl+qXuPEYDWRlcwYqJvlpSGqGFrIlsP 7YIrdaGSAk;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=ginsberg@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:43:42 -0700
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Eric -

Base IS-IS spec is ISO 10589 - which does not fall under the
jurisdiction of IETF. When IS-IS WG was formed in late 90's to address
IP centric issues no authority was granted to the IETF to make changes
to the IS-IS standard - so all RFCs were published as informational.

RFC 3563 documents a working agreement between ISOC/IETF and ISO/IEC
which was put in place a few years ago which allows IETF to publish
standards documents relating to IS-IS with certain agreed upon scope.

As a result of that agreement many previously published RFCs are now
being reissued as proposed standards - this document being one of them.

   Les



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.gray@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:13 PM
> To: Mike Shand (mshand); Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; Ross Callon
> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
> 
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer
> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
> posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt
> Reviewer: Eric Gray
> Review Date:  27 June, 2008
> IESG Telechat date: 03 July, 2008
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is ready for publishing as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> Comments:
> 
> As a point of curiosity, why were these documents not published
> directly as Draft Standards?  I am reasonably sure they would
> qualify.
> 
> I compared this document using rfcdiff against the original RFC
> and found only minor stylistic changes (reference styles, format
> of some bullets, etc.) and boiler-plate differences.  Hence this
> draft is as ready to be published as was the original RFC - i.e.
> - quite ready.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email