[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-aii-aggregate-02

Pasi et al,
Good feedback as usual from the gen-art folk, thanks!

Comments inline, primarily for the draft editors.  I don't believe
there's anything significant here that can't be addressed in
RFC Editor comments.

On Mar 18, 2007, at 6:35 AM, <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>  
<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> wrote:

> 1) As the PROTO write-up already pointed out, the current version
> has a normative downward reference to draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgpvpn-auto.
> To me it seems this might be changed to informative reference,
> but probably someone more familiar with the protocol(s) should
> also confirm this.

Yep.

> 2) In Section 3.2 the document uses the phrases like "the AC ID is
> NULL" to mean that that "AC ID" field is not included in the message
> at all. I found this a bit confusing; probably something like "the AC
> ID field is omitted" would be clearer?

Yes, and tightening up the corresponding text in the final
bullet of section 3.2.

> 3) Section 3.2, "If the global ID is derived from a 2-octet AS
> number, then the high-order 4 octets of this 4 octet field MUST
> be set to zero." Should this be "...the high-order 2 octets..."?

Yes, I believe so..

> 4) The document uses RFC 2119 keywords, but does not include
> RFC 2119 in the references list.

Indeed..

-danny

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art