Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-08.txt

Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com> Mon, 11 May 2009 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ED73A69AF for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0RBV5NI-Y7t for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtpout019.mac.com (asmtpout019.mac.com [17.148.16.94]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1C73A686C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (adsl-70-132-14-234.dsl.snfc21.sbcglobal.net [70.132.14.234]) by asmtp019.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KJH009H6WF4I240@asmtp019.mac.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <8D4627D2-F4A7-48BA-8575-2CC663077C64@mac.com>
From: Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
In-reply-to: <4A014998.9020209@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:49:50 -0700
References: <4A014998.9020209@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-08.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 19:48:37 -0000

Gonzalo -

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.

Many thanks for the feedback.

> Draft: draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-08.txt
> Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
> Review Date: 6 May 2009
>
> Summary:
>
> This draft is ready for publication as an experimental RFC.
>
>
> Comments:
>
> In general, abstracts should not contain references. In this document
> the abstract references RFC 3168. In any case, the way the abstract
> references it is not particularly confusing. Therefore, the authors  
> may
> choose to leave it as it is.
>
> Some references to RFC 3168 in the text do not actually include any
> reference in brackets. References to an RFC should be in the form "RFC
> 3168 [RFC3168] says ...".

I fixed it.  (My own preference would be not to add the reference  
[RFC3168]
when it already appears earlier in the same paragraph, or in the  
paragraph
above, but I see that the RFC Document Style manual specifies  
otherwise...)

Thanks,
- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/