IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 19 August 2015 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D0F1A0032 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGV4Jms7HHk9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [37.72.100.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D9C1A0037 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [186.137.82.224] (helo=[192.168.3.107]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1ZSBLt-0003oB-OG; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:56:58 +0200
Message-ID: <55D4FB9D.9090609@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:56:45 +0200
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <201507171838.t6HIcjLf088779@givry.fdupont.fr> <55D3C537.3020204@si6networks.com> <95D58F8C-EAA1-42E1-B5CA-056CFB582BFB@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <95D58F8C-EAA1-42E1-B5CA-056CFB582BFB@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/gSEiL_HF5gIVbl_E-E30iESvarQ>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:57:04 -0000

Hi, Jari,

On 08/19/2015 11:14 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Francis: thank you very much for your review.
> 
> Fernando: I think it is a reasonable practice to refer to the obsoleted document
> in the abstract (and in the Updates-from-RFCnnnn section).

Yes... that was my take as well... this was based on previous experience
with other documents I had authored...

(Double-checking: No changes needed in this respect, right?)

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email