IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 20 August 2015 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2431B2C0C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqcdSidIUfoW for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B639E1B2C0B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1082CCBE; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:11:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsFjNehRH6Wy; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:11:19 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F418F2CC5C; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:11:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B758074C-197A-4A56-8520-2BB59D7E1454"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55D4FB9D.9090609@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:11:17 +0300
Message-Id: <BE4A349A-8FF0-4527-B01F-85D198566D15@piuha.net>
References: <201507171838.t6HIcjLf088779@givry.fdupont.fr> <55D3C537.3020204@si6networks.com> <95D58F8C-EAA1-42E1-B5CA-056CFB582BFB@piuha.net> <55D4FB9D.9090609@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mJ1bSNPILCJWBJxEDxR9BxtNoCs>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:11:23 -0000

On 20 Aug 2015, at 00:56, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> Hi, Jari,
> 
> On 08/19/2015 11:14 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> Francis: thank you very much for your review.
>> 
>> Fernando: I think it is a reasonable practice to refer to the obsoleted document
>> in the abstract (and in the Updates-from-RFCnnnn section).
> 
> Yes... that was my take as well... this was based on previous experience
> with other documents I had authored...
> 
> (Double-checking: No changes needed in this respect, right?)

I think that is right.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email