IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfsdirect-07.txt

"Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com> Thu, 17 April 2008 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF48428C4A7; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9F43A6F2D for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqP44ntKwozc for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436F43A6B63 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,668,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="32052330"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2008 18:23:40 -0700
Received: from svlexrs01.hq.netapp.com (svlexrs01.corp.netapp.com [10.57.156.158]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id m3H1NaPa007567; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exsvlrb01.hq.netapp.com ([10.56.8.62]) by svlexrs01.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:36 -0700
Received: from exnane01.hq.netapp.com ([10.97.0.61]) by exsvlrb01.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:23:36 -0700
Received: from TMT.netapp.com ([10.30.32.55]) by exnane01.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:23:56 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:13:19 -0400
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
From: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200803211557.m2LFvXIo098618@givry.fdupont.fr>
References: <200803211557.m2LFvXIo098618@givry.fdupont.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <EXNANE017a0xtAEHLB8000002d5@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2008 01:23:56.0648 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4BD7E80:01C8A029]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:57:37 -0700
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, thomas.talpey@netapp.com, nfsv4-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, brentc@apple.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfsdirect-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

At 11:57 AM 3/21/2008, Francis Dupont wrote:
>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>reviewer for this draft
>...
>Editorial:
> - 3 page 3, etc: about the case of read/write: operations should get
>  all uppercase, list only the first letter and other all lowercase.
>  In term of grammar: nouns are in all uppercase, adjective one uppercase,
>  verb all lowercase. Applying this:
>...
>   4 page 5: "RDMA READs" and "RDMA READ"
>...

I have incorporated almost all of your comments, but felt I should
indicate why I did not take just one in particular. The terms
"RDMA Read" and "RDMA Write" are used consistently with these
letter cases throughout RFC5040 and other documents, so it seems
best to retain their style here. Your observation did lead me to fix
a couple of other inconsistencies, however!

Thanks for the careful review. "Acknowledgment" being spelled
inconsistently was a particular surprise! :-)

Tom.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email