IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 28 August 2017 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95D21329C5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCfsdnLCgI4u for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1007C1320D8 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=lzzjeF1V3tBs4VkazCQbdVJ2WXx1OiFhA424OYMm/rE3Rcff61IgpB9m0DkOEV05URTDM4gKtmSzqM7fKYy9J0lThbb2VudvouK1pE5BsCeGmtObVZZEx0qXEQFA84EtUsPM8Bt4lnrE7GDkiuunO1ak5Ih8PLn8cwifemLE5RA=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 20422 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2017 12:59:50 +0200
Received: from pd9e11f2c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (217.225.31.44) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 28 Aug 2017 12:59:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <150274094205.10409.17989486864216331116@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:59:50 +0200
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E041128-6DB8-47BC-AD58-C507A84AE2F1@kuehlewind.net>
References: <150274094205.10409.17989486864216331116@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20170828105950.20417.68608@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hkMUIxG892crhpPk9DjtkAdCPCc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:59:55 -0000

Thanks for the review!

> Am 14.08.2017 um 22:02 schrieb Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2017-08-14
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-25
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This is a well written draft and is ready for publication.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> You repeat the text:
> 
> "A message is considered in flight, if at least  on of its I-DATA chunks is not
> acknowledged in a non-renegable way"  in two consecutive sections, maybe a
> common definition could be used.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email