Re: [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-14
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 24 September 2015 02:53 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEC81B308F; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXZ1RDDlREK2; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65AA1B3659; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79ef6d000007f54-81-56030680d672
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 92.25.32596.08603065; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:07:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:53:35 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-14
Thread-Index: AQHQ9XhDD+B/b1/F6Ua3Udgff/dJ+w==
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 02:53:33 +0000
Message-ID: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A9682EF@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <em2240cd8c-30a7-454b-9e88-40b7f39ab393@sydney>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPiG4jG3OYQftGPovpZ/4yWnxc+I3F 4t+6o0wWR87+ZrG4+uozi8WMPxOZLc5f2MBkceXILzYHDo8pvzeyenx58pLJY8mSn0weDfuO sgewRHHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlnD+xlrmgVazi8Knb7A2MPYJdjJwcEgImEp1zv7JB2GISF+6t B7K5OIQEjjJK7Pz5hgXCWc4oMb3hFQtIFRtQx4adn5lAbBGBc0wSN5+wg9jMAqoS9583g00S FnCWuPv7OBtEjYvErNurWSBsPYnm6dfB4ixA9ZuWLgbr5RXwleiftBMsLiRgLTH/5xdWEJsR 6KLvp9YwQcwXl7j1ZD4TxKUCEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0nMeX2NGaJeR2LB7k9sELa2xLKF r5khdglKnJz5hGUCo+gsJGNnIWmZhaRlFpKWBYwsqxg5SotTy3LTjQw2MQLj65gEm+4Oxj0v LQ8xCnAwKvHwLnjBFCbEmlhWXJl7iFGag0VJnHf/kvuhQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZ ODilGhgNt/47duFVtNrOrh8JKz5z57uL7Ls1y3XzgX337WfwpRyX+2+8pKJ2pVNh7KSg+wrM b5u/ZoUIH/vVpe9Z/vnsUb0pgabR1R+MJxnInVkzs7qGQ0Ts/EMjtmoT/TeuzawfSv44hvI0 PN3n8jlvYtiS2/8X/G81sj69+f7uA/+blwZOcim59+iIEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAAAK9e5ACAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jFmZV_n1tYa-ywICCxS6ZBu0P44>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 02:53:38 -0000
Hi Paul, Your proposed changes completely resolve my concerns on -13. Thanks for taking care of this. Cheers Suresh On 09/22/2015 04:50 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote: > Folks, > Alissa asked me to review the current text, provide input, and help > address some of the current DISCUSS points. > Here are some suggested improvements: > Editorial: > > * In Section 4.1, it says "Subsequent FloorStatus messages consist of > server-initiated transactions, and therefore their Transaction ID is > 0." This is true since the transport in these examples is > reliable. While perhaps minor, I think it might be worth explicitly > stating that be appending "given the example uses a reliable > transport", otherwise the reader may miss that there is a difference > in behavior when communicating over unreliable transports. > * In 5.3.7, it says "the following is the format of the FloorRequest > message". That should be "FloorQuery message" > * In 6.2.3, the equation: > (message size - COMMON-HEADER size / MTU size - COMMON-HEADER size) > for better readability should say: > ((message size - COMMON-HEADER size) / (MTU size - COMMON-HEADER > size)) > * In 10.2.2, it reads "A message from the floor control server is > considered a response to the *FloorRelease *message if the message > from the floor control server has the same Conference ID, > Transaction ID, and User ID as the *FloorRequest* message." I > believe "FloorRequest" should be "FloorRelease". > * A similar copy/paste error as above was noted in 12.1.2. > * I think it would be beneficial in Appendix A to explicitly show what > the "R" value is. It is possible for a floor participant and a > floor control server to each initiate a transaction at the same time > with Transaction ID == 124, for example. The "R" bit is what helps > to differentiate transactions and their responses, and I think that > would be helpful here. > > Technical: > > * Section 10.1.1 says the "User ID will be used by the floor control > server to authenticate and authorize the request." TLS/DTLS is used > for authentication/authorization presently. Further, the draft more > than once that other mechanisms might be developed in the > future. Merely looking at this field in a message, though, is not > sufficient to authenticate or authorize a request. This existed in > the original RFC, but I propose we strike the sentence. > > Paul
- [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582b… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4… Suresh Krishnan