[Gen-art] Re: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17 ietf last call Genart review

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

Hi Scott,

Just one suggestion to address Reese’s comments. See inline with [mj]

> On Oct 12, 2025, at 5:46 AM, Scott Mansfield <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello, and thank you for the review!
> 
> Please see my responses and suggested actions marked by <scott></scott> in-line below.  Let me know if the resolutions are acceptable, and I will re-spin the draft.
> 
> Regards and Thanks,
> -scott.
> 
> Snip...
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Section 9 (Security Considerations) has RFC AAAA, but I don't see where that reference is defined. Please double-check that this reference is clear.
> <scott>
> This is from the Security Considerations template found in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.  I suggest that I simply take out the first sentence of that section since draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis isn't an RFC yet.  Leave the rest of the section because the new template is easy to read and use.
> </scott>

[mj] I would just refer to the I-D itself or add a “Note to the RFC Editor”.

You can say - “This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 of [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]” and let the editor insert the right RFC number when it is assigned (possibly before this document gets to publication state).

Alternatively, you can add a “Note to the RFC Editor” and mention that AAAA should be the number that will be assigned to I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.

Thanks

Mahesh Jethanandani
[e-mail]