IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 06 February 2018 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1738612D856; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:53:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wyLEU4haMGjh; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C2212702E; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:53:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w16Gn3vC016010; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:53:17 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=cVQPjSS6LvalPwbT03o/PYJ1wx9wEzHLCf4vBYlQoic=; b=LsYQPtJxAoLpYVdsotHxFZvoDcAw3MInduqwVMJvG7XYhLN9FgdYcHWDNMXal9K+vDjS ZelxJwOA9qGTuMu+FFKkkJqOZtN1PfwEjAD+qjJXeL1Ywbh15po8Eq3mpzuq49F9f696 LDFiEiiKhbILZCK/CaQIKPxlhHDPzBArQ+0X+c1kJTYj8EeW8SR3RpRLEGBZZV72n+fm C4EVXXAJq4KNDTXYFkN8WyGM3rI8j7QA/SyE7SHxFUDOO+MYdPd95Q9Wbc3DWV/vSeTI 1I8B8Mkva1I0vp+n6YIT/9C6cWcbxqGldF1Nj4y+TI3dMgajQsAkmQH1NTRzGzlIPOEe iQ==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp0082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.82]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fyeuer6ek-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 06 Feb 2018 08:53:16 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3594.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.242.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.485.3; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:53:14 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) with mapi id 15.20.0485.009; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:53:14 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-anima-voucher.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-voucher.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05
Thread-Index: AQHTPGi5q/3Pt4VbI0GC5GRZwJfxLKOYCVEA
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:53:14 +0000
Message-ID: <EFD2A9EB-47AE-4233-93FE-C215225F3987@juniper.net>
References: <150704985762.30710.15389510349503177651@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150704985762.30710.15389510349503177651@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3594; 7:D8g+Z1uI2pfHZmOyddx2f6TK7WNqJmKWhiRgP0TISlnjoHxT0jS1z1tXicGKNjcph3qGTnPx1jvRbTQcfkNE/EMC1sAZ5qoNP4mMuDffIorN0mFgsNrbquTAWkFscawczQgd06evTe5Fpj+R3pzWjMSPKdevZ7ypmnTmJXN4bbwmPumqoaGdU8Q+ZzcFWHE5Xcfj0VV7w7zRVUr0lzzKyxugcDhiMG6FjsJF0Lpxw0CYwdzpri2pCQhCF2OKJHqj
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1c47531b-d53c-4686-2afc-08d56d821d59
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3594;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3594:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB35945CB02D2CF5194CEBDF3DA5FD0@DM5PR05MB3594.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231101)(2400082)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3594; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3594;
x-forefront-prvs: 0575F81B58
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(39380400002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(53754006)(51444003)(229853002)(83716003)(2950100002)(8936002)(3280700002)(2900100001)(106356001)(81166006)(14454004)(81156014)(8676002)(99286004)(76176011)(102836004)(26005)(3660700001)(186003)(54906003)(110136005)(6506007)(68736007)(4326008)(5660300001)(316002)(83506002)(478600001)(58126008)(77096007)(3846002)(7736002)(86362001)(305945005)(82746002)(6512007)(6436002)(6486002)(6116002)(105586002)(25786009)(2906002)(33656002)(36756003)(2501003)(53936002)(6246003)(97736004)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3594; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tKIgsDIYKeZ7eflVo8LYP4NQ3jGbKWCYmFpzM+mHv/nawMPMzG0JBRL+iJ1D7wsGKaJNfnLnAcZYmW6y4PvDfQ==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FDF8C023DA21734B866325A5AA9AE18F@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1c47531b-d53c-4686-2afc-08d56d821d59
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2018 16:53:14.7727 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3594
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-02-06_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802060212
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kEaOyLM1Mquf8jvq_2A8TTohh2k>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:53:23 -0000

Hi all,

Russ's comment led to the creation of an eContentType OID called
id-ct-animaJSONVoucher.  Given that YANG modeled data can be 
encoded in XML or JSON, I think that we made a mistake in only
registering the JSON encoding.

FWIW, we originally choose to standardize on just JSON because
we were trying to avoid the signaling complexity, exactly what
this eContentType value provides.  It seems that, when we added
the OID, we should've reexamined that earlier decision.

While I'd love to say that the fix is just a matter registering
another OID, that draft uses the word "JSON" throughout, so a 
slightly more involved edit would be needed.

Thoughts?  Is it too late?

Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email