[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Mon, 11 June 2007 16:17 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxmZx-0001zO-MW; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:17 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HxmZw-0001uQ-Kk for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxmZw-0001sH-AN for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:16 -0400
Received: from [2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e] (helo=givry.fdupont.fr) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxmZu-0002Is-Uw for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:16 -0400
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BGH7pd039057; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:17:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200706111617.l5BGH7pd039057@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:17:07 +0200
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: cpignata@cisco.com, dmm@1-4-5.net, vijay@umbc.edu, rcallon@juniper.net, heas@shrubbery.net, psavola@funet.fi
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2007/06/10
IETF LC End Date: 2007/06/15
IESG Telechat date: not known

Summary: Almost Ready

Comments: I have only one major comment: the document does not explain
it is a revision of RFC 3682, I propose to add a sentence at the
beginning of the introduction stating that with a reference.
Other points (minor/editorial/for the RFC editor):
 - 2 page 4 in:
   "The possibility of denial-of-service (DoS) attack prevention,
   however, is based on the assumption that packet classification and
   separation of their paths is done before they go through a scarce
   resource in the system."
   two proposals: "is" -> "are" and "packet classification" ->
   "classification of (the?) packets"

 - 2.2 page 5: (i.e., trusted) -> (i.e., are trusted)

 - 5.1 page 7: hasn't -> has not

 - 5.5 page 12: multi-hop -> multi-hop case

 - 6.1 page 12: add a reference for RFC 3682 here (in fact, everywhere
   at the exception of the abstract).

 - A page 14: I can't parse "within "TrustRadius" (e.g., 1)
   of 255 instead of 255"
 
Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art