Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART (Telechat) review for draft-ietf-core-coap-16

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 May 2013 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982C321F84B1 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFCjGw6gHivD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCE621F9234 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527152CC48; Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:53 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-ZuogiFUA4C; Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:51 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED67E2CC3C; Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:50 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA16AC61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:50 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DCD5E04-3709-4820-92BC-3EEFBECDB7A2@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0D2F09@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA16AC61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: draft-ietf-core-coap@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, core-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART (Telechat) review for draft-ietf-core-coap-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:50:02 -0000

Dan:

Thanks again for the review and checking back on subsequent versions whether all issues were addressed. This has helped me tremendously, and already made an improvement in the document itself, which is the main purpose of the reviews in the IESG and review teams.

I have some history with this document, and have spent a big part of today to re-read it. I also went through the two remaining issues, manageability and security considerations of parameter changes per S4.81. I am of the opinion that the overall set of specs in this space (link format, coap, possible future official work on the directory, …) addresses at least some of the manageability aspects. But I do agree that the parameter change aspect should be covered in the security considerations and have placed a comment to this effect on my IESG review.

Thanks again all for the work both by the reviewers and authors and the WG!

Jari

On May 13, 2013, at 2:23 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> My previous review on draft-ietf-core-coap-15 still stands. Between versions 15 and 16 of the document I cannot see any changes that address issues #2 and #3 in my initial review. In cased I missed something please let me know. It is up to the General Area Director and the rest of the IESG to assess whether these issues are blocking.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:05 PM
>> To: General Area Review Team
>> Cc: draft-ietf-core-coap@tools.ietf.org; Barry Leiba; core-
>> chairs@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART (Telechat) review for draft-ietf-core-coap-15
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-core-coap-15
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review Date: 3/27/2013
>> IETF LC End Date: 3/27/2013
>> IESG Telechat date: 4/25/2013
>> 
>> Summary: This document is almost ready. Some of the issues in my first
>> review of the document were addressed in draft-15, or clarified by the
>> authors in their responses. However issues #2 and #3 in the major issues
>> list were not addressed in the revised I-D. It is up to the General Area
>> Director and the rest of the IESG to assess whether these issues are
>> blocking.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art