[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08
Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2962712A060; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:24:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148676904616.29176.18172899169844310297.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:24:06 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nVPjLHJ_rT_eEsR86awLRdv02OA>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:24:06 -0000
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08 Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review Date: 2017-02-10 IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-31 IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16 Summary: Ready with Nits A couple of nits that I mentioned in my earlier review that you might want to address, but none of them are essential. (You may have decided that I was wrong; that's OK too.) I didn't bother Cc'ing the IETF list on this, since they're both very minor. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: 3.1: A set of non-overlapping available frequency ranges MUST be disseminated in order to allow efficient resource management of flexi-grid DWDM links and RSA procedures which are described in Section 4.8 of [RFC7698]. Those MUSTs look weird to me. I think instead of "MUST be" you mean "are", since it doesn't look like an implementation really has a choice here. 3.2: Hence, in order to support all possible applications and implementations the following information should be advertised for a flexi-grid DWDM link: Is that "should" in there meant to be normative? That is, do bad things happen if I don't advertise one of those items? Or do you just mean "the following information is advertised..."?
- [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-gri… Pete Resnick
- [Gen-art] 答复: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible… Pete Resnick
- [Gen-art] 答复: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible… Jari Arkko