IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 07 October 2015 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21581ACE40 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9oF20ot1mubF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77441ACE3F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbbh8 with SMTP id bh8so20197601obb.0 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+En807p7CtNFKdNDQTiwUVEP/dCWIYQTRJYHwePenDw=; b=YXifiNliquWtZlE/qmlRoDOA82KY7i7ksqSKYurrhn+VI5VvMOfPIA8c3d3i7uZrvS i662SH25c/wOb5MqhV6WRiGTNx/yb7pav7BdAsqkg++Ee9wBTtvf8jIWP3XvZ+KMSK2s Y7nkuwq4mTZKnb/GVTbKTMAJitdJniPBtx8ci2Eqz40sgZlOdXqESgzwlAZT+B/in+wT wugHrrPplzZ1LRp4w3LWP49/wPeL+Bw54nmnmS9tJB2s4qzsrpe8Ov9F3KOxUxUFmLgK AXxfholBfh+Bi10Nze9kVvUx3RD3Tezp9Ck6wbzdAnR+g9owEP7UOVXH45qGj6xoiFza NBtg==
X-Received: by 10.60.23.1 with SMTP id i1mr1693857oef.57.1444242400002; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.144.65 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <03d601d0fd26$dee1d0f0$9ca572d0$@gmail.com>
References: <03d601d0fd26$dee1d0f0$9ca572d0$@gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:26:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFdjmExbVgWJJznDBuWu7gDxYxrj8Tc7ifs4BZm+R22Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33d4ec38d426052187e379"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/pHPHnp99HvWIfO6ma1swLhuAXyY>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-cmt.all@tools.ietf.org, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:26:44 -0000

I believe the -10 version posted today resolves your comments.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
> may receive.
>
> Document:  draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08
>
> Reviewer: Roni Even
>
> Review Date:2015–10-2
>
> IETF LC End Date: 2015–10-5
>
> IESG Telechat date:
>
>
>
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standard Track  RFC.
>
>
>
>
>
> Major issues:
>
>
>
>
>
> Minor issues:
>
>
>
>
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> In section 4.1 last paragraph “that are do not support” should be “that do
> not support”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email