IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 25 January 2015 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05EF1A0A6A for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3k0OsWDlDWe for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CCA01A09C9 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id eu11so7636157pac.2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDfgX5l/89tSnBYAUAm4tB3zX4/cibA07tUcb99E8Bw=; b=F00mbXoslSukhXCz077kj2P6ET6Wf9y57ytIDTthe8EgaLbqJgwX+0N1kzVv1E6gJn Uk8Op1PizorTBTpCoV67J9zggto0SNJd7eoXMpPeg8cKhhIuHXjGUK2HLQj+xN+e472m +UJAab7x8jcVzlVhViN+MvcVwVGGnLlLt/OAjDiyMKJnW9k1lumm15RRMweqhwlHPaEv HNdhymFvzPp76xh/kPWd+xCmwbT6HbPbXIyUmXF3ND6RoY61V6ktL2wnyiqf3Od+1b7/ EoNl5UZgSCBDeCovL35BLXKbOTB/aEwZXIwL8EHTZh5wu9JqKOozoDfz1nXa3wGKVgEQ dNfg==
X-Received: by 10.70.49.16 with SMTP id q16mr28511366pdn.2.1422214149796; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (53.224.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.224.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm7862819pdg.62.2015.01.25.11.29.06 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54C54401.5060708@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:29:05 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/qb_mBPyNcu2A_skU1Dhk1xa7AyY>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:29:13 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-01-26
IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-04
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Almost ready
--------

Minor issues:
-------------

1. Hop-by-hop options, and therefore Router Alert, are well known to
cause a serious performance issue or are simply ignored by many
routers (as warned in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7045#section-2.2).
A pointer to that warning would be appropriate.

2. I'm a bit surprised to realise that new definitions of Router Alert
options are not routinely notified to the 6MAN WG.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email