IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 19 April 2013 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134A821F8512; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52UppMhSmAYj; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E1C21F8528; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C4F1C22147; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.155.104.126] (unknown [129.192.170.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 521FD1C2212C; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5171C416.5070105@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:24:22 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
References: <5170722E.2070401@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5170722E.2070401@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, David Kessens <david.kessens@nsn.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:24:25 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
     Common YANG Data Types
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 19-April-2013
IETF LC End Date: 1-May-2013
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Standards 
Track RFC

Major issues:
     (The following may well be a non-issue.)
     In the revision of the ietf-inet-types, the patterns for the new 
ip4-address-no-zone and ipv6-address-no-zone are drastically simplified 
from the ipv4-address and ipv6-address patterns.  The new 
ipv4-address-no-zone allows any sequence of decimal digits an periods, 
while the original was carefully defined as dotted quads of 0..255. 
Similarly, te ipv6-address-no-zone allows any arbitrary sequence of hex 
digits and colons.  The original patterns were very careful to match 
rules for validity.  Is there a reason for the change.

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email