Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Forwarding to the authors and WG

Regards, Benoit
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
>     Common YANG Data Types
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 19-April-2013
> IETF LC End Date: 1-May-2013
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Standards 
> Track RFC
>
> Major issues:
>     (The following may well be a non-issue.)
>     In the revision of the ietf-inet-types, the patterns for the new 
> ip4-address-no-zone and ipv6-address-no-zone are drastically 
> simplified from the ipv4-address and ipv6-address patterns.  The new 
> ipv4-address-no-zone allows any sequence of decimal digits an periods, 
> while the original was carefully defined as dotted quads of 0..255. 
> Similarly, te ipv6-address-no-zone allows any arbitrary sequence of 
> hex digits and colons.  The original patterns were very careful to 
> match rules for validity.  Is there a reason for the change.
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
>