Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05

"Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 24 May 2018 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB76D12E876; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIHY8xQLox4y; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:241:204::f0f0]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D02D12DA4A; Thu, 24 May 2018 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [137.50.183.77] (oa-edu-183-77.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.183.77]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DA9E1B001E2; Thu, 24 May 2018 14:10:40 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-7BEAC292-FBBF-4DD3-BD85-E617CFF1B66E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15E216)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-c3SOznmcWOv6uYD9JfadAXfFsT=M1Jy+eMtH1G5yCjig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 14:10:40 +0100
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry.all@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FDAEBBF6-4D89-4E7E-BCDA-71963C7B4267@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <152710087741.26946.16536512145385148907@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-c3SOznmcWOv6uYD9JfadAXfFsT=M1Jy+eMtH1G5yCjig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uD5lkcNPdkvgwQEPgzavwj64KyE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 13:10:44 -0000

Happy to make this change - thanks for noting this.

Gorry 

> On 24 May 2018, at 13:44, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Christer,
> 
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:41 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05
>> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
>> Review Date: 2018-05-23
>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-25
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. I have
>> one minor editorial comment that I'd like the authors to address.
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: None
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> The Abstract says:
>> 
>> "This update to RFC2474 changes the IANA assignment method..."
>> 
>> ...and the Introduction says:
>> 
>>  "To allow the IETF to utilise Pool 3 codepoints, this document
>>    requests IANA to to manage Pool 3 assignments for DSCP values in Pool
>>    3 via the Standards Action policy [RFC8126].  This assignment method
>>    requires publication of a Standards Track or Best Current Practice
>>    RFC."
>> 
>> I suggest to replace "method" with "policy".
> 
> I think that's right. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8126#section-4 does call these "assignment policies".
> 
> Gorry, if you agree, could you make that change? 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer