IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC6A127077; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvaY9NeFSzw8; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x229.google.com (mail-ot0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241FB1294F8; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 45so16562607otd.2; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9zdbH0lzB0xr4x+0E7Y9fLhoxqODMxajQ/9ZOJFAhlg=; b=bbrtje2YKCE59y+SR9isQjCQ+pnA5CAvCuqhOX+QfLK8tAb5N7895UrpGpkF8SQa03 rNdKYLjY3TU0DODgaRMtwdcI+yGaiEXKr593PWtyupvJIwtfhoS2s+t7SItMki9QDWPb qp7XvZij7vRW8+PVeTQyX+Xq7JZnfmUpmGaFRMUntDBIRL443sT08KPfG88S/9OMhdkz 8fcMElRc1Va336wNYNyp5Y5zzRLJ0NC87OOMrJTM+1Yp+WDCv+2rUhCAYdHnwi/Tsalu OToaQJL3saVBGnLak8FU/XPiyUWFFsYccTLjkXkQg1ZE5ZwBubA0YKTBnJQ+vkI0jaUU p2sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9zdbH0lzB0xr4x+0E7Y9fLhoxqODMxajQ/9ZOJFAhlg=; b=jmioVtnX/M0jftIRf7V3+Q67QAtiPdY23gGItceIqaeivG4XG8DwHmely9IZIAbBcl b2y0uxrP0xbNQWqq7zA906SVvNRRAh46J1IJee+zCrwBUahMNCmRy/nHSaPss0sEyvbZ qAb7Jar/e3NWRNACH9eeM6Cx9saaNu+GWKbMzpK4LmFJMsDIhazG1SfahKPq9tzugLST rhdLz0B6rXyU601RmVcV6zcbBK4EinlhQDYzP7YDUR3Vsn5UjrAib6nJaKFAv+dTcEY8 yJDIo1OwgGQqUzf3HMOC9aWZHHWNZgyp7/D14bIghQiUglyqYqUEQTxofasCMgHqp6fc UFWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mlFicM4T0Gihsktmayisgs2xXdvUWJqwRs1MHV6oOKTWBdlOPB4NSAdDSPh5F0rp+FH+8uGcReSAWvpw==
X-Received: by 10.157.8.42 with SMTP id 39mr1799724oty.249.1487268770557; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.159.42 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <baf6ae46-3d87-4930-9d9f-1e7febfb07e9@gmail.com>
References: <148649120072.19411.7489137402403290375.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <baf6ae46-3d87-4930-9d9f-1e7febfb07e9@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:12:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0jV=dTKdwm3+j4s24Pk7-5qvtU2_64Lih==kUs47cZ7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c048a90c1371f0548a9be09"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uHOYuCGWj7NTJH10KZQ-fovm0Oo>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:12:54 -0000

Russ,

This isn’t normal practice, but based on your comment, the IPR declaration
has been reissued explicitly for the WG draft.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Russ
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> I would like to respond to one point:
>
>
> Notes:
>>
>> I see that draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection the
>> earlier
>> Internet-Draft file name for this document.  An IPR declaration was
>> issued against that earlier name.  The shepherd write-up indicates
>> that
>> "The WG were not concerned about the IPR disclosure." However, it is
>> unclear to me whether we should ask for the IPR declaration to be
>> issued
>> against the current Internet-Draft file name.
>>
>>
> The authors all responded including of course the author from the company
> that
> filed the IPR. All indicated that no additional IPR was known about.
>
> The IPR disclosure shows up in datatracker.
>
> We do not normally chase companies to update their IPR disclosures, as
> documents progress, and indeed if we chase them to do this update we need
> to chase them shortly for a further one as the draft becomes an RFC.
>
> Since you pointed it out we have asked the author to ask his patent dept
> to do the update, but I hope that this does not become an IETF policy
> making it even harder to pass the IPR checks that we put in place in RTG.
>
> Thanks
>
> Stewart
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email