[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-quickstart-06.txt

Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com> Tue, 03 October 2006 13:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUk8x-00059c-3B; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:17:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUi51-0004LF-HW for gen-art@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:04:55 -0400
Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.177]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUi4z-000144-4W for gen-art@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:04:55 -0400
Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k93B4kJZ029675; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 04:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.248.206.126] (mix-orleans-106-4-126.w193-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.248.206.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k93B324t028442; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 04:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200609282155.k8SLtXjF012536@tao.fdupont.fr>
References: <200609282155.k8SLtXjF012536@tao.fdupont.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <3b542b2a01fa38a6a7f35a6bcbf00383@mac.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:04:35 -0700
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
X-Brightmail-scanned: yes
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:17:06 -0400
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>, Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>, Amit Jain <a.jain@f5.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-quickstart-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Francis -

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Many thanks for the review!   We have made all of the editing changes 
that you
suggested, and I will post the revised draft to the Quick-Start web 
page in a day or two
(after all of the co-authors have had a change to see all of the 
changes).  Two items
that are left are the two items requiring feedback from v6ops or IPv6 
people.

Some detailed feedback is below.

> Comments: I have two major concerns and some minor comments:
>  * the overview (section 2.1, pages 15-17) fails to introduce the
>    real protocol: no mention of the report or of the fact the
>    response is carried in a TCP option, at the opposite of request
>    and report. So when a new reader reaches the page 20 he is lost
>    (at least I was the first time :-).
>    I believe it is easy to fix, the only issue is to get a "fresh"
>    reader to check the new text...

I have make these changes, but I don't really think that it needs a 
"fresh"
reader to check it out.  Section 2.1 had a general discussion of 
"transport-level
mechanisms to inform the sender of the status of the Quick-Start 
Request",
and I added some sentences making it explicit that for TCP, this is done
with the Quick-Start Response option in the TCP header.

>  * the IPv6 part needs to be improved: I suggest to ask in the mailing
>    list(s) or the WG chairs, perhaps more v6ops than ipv6 as questions
>    are more about concrete details than protocol theory.
>    See below for some examples of this concern.

Yep, we put this on the TODO list.

>  - 4.1 page 28: there is a nice discussion about end point address
>    changes. As it should become common with IPv6 multi-homing IMHO
>    it should be read by IPv6 people...

This is on the TODO list also.

- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art