Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2015 23:36 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1791F1B35F0; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RrSF09F6YXjm; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397A31B35BC; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pactm7 with SMTP id tm7so111834822pac.2; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CHr4tQbGoEgc1Q0HctClejMoMGaJADFRaq93w6PR46I=; b=UOoMgkIoUCQ1cV2pcMqf4Chrm4D0hpvJUcICRgGw8i6da5Di2BcCLIOgS23A658ZQD pqy7T1kZQ7HPWVuSSa9zu2t/0bVkm9tPvp23ftSSMaiOySpvZnwJLPN1NdOOIduQ5m1T f9X5JxS9BdjiUe5EgaEBxIuc5lNfhPqFHraW+EqJGMd4cV5Z0odezhBrEphkYTDYNyCx svnd1ETwVa/APZLeCGKKWdjmfKdt+nMwKq5Bc0fU5H7d8vUNt4xvGEHDBUZJqzjgMwSN LZYyLXvBF+uo95Bh0lxXS7qJgYhPTN/5xciH8lXDHafCzi+cKPJ6CQk+OvngbZhdoHeT pN6g==
X-Received: by 10.70.103.10 with SMTP id fs10mr36395052pdb.141.1435621005908; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6ec9:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6ec9:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ks7sm43347198pbc.34.2015.06.29.16.36.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5591D689.50206@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:36:41 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <557B9741.4090008@gmail.com> <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F7463F8@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <5591AB3B.3000003@gmail.com> <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F746487@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F746487@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/vSmenVF7998FOXmvjQCKnrfG_UM>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:36:48 -0000
That looks fine (in the -06), thanks. However, note that an IANA Considerations section is always required, even if it says that no IANA action is necessary. Regards Brian Carpenter On 30/06/2015 08:38, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for your consideration and for providing the modified text quickly. That works and it's a great help. > Shall update this in the next version. > -- > Uma C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:32 PM > To: Uma Chunduri; draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis.all@ietf.org; General Area Review Team > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 > > Hi Uma, > > See below... > On 30/06/2015 06:19, Uma Chunduri wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side). >> Response i-line [Uma]: >> >> -- >> Uma C. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:37 PM >> To: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis.all@ietf.org; General Area Review >> Team >> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04.txt >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >> Review Date: 2015-06-13 >> IETF LC End Date: 2015-07-03 >> IESG Telechat date: >> >> Summary: Almost ready >> -------- >> >> Minor Issue: >> ------------ >> >>> 3.2. Key Management Protocols >> >> I don't like the references to expired drafts. These drafts almost have the flavour of normative references, since apparently they described recommended mitigation techniques. If they matter, they should be properly available. >> draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 >> draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 >> draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05 >> >> [Uma]: Sure. But to give a bit context quickly - >> >> KARP WG started working on group keying protocol based on IKEv2 when I used these references. But, later scope is changed and this aspect didn't go forward as expected. >> So I would remove the references to draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 and >> draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05. However, though expired, I would like to >> keep the reference for >> draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 and associated RFC 6407, so in future it can present a good reference to GDOI in this context. Hope this is acceptable else I shall remove this too. > > Thanks for the answer. I am still a bit concerned that a reader will be slightly confused, though. Can I suggest trying to rephrase the sentence a bit, something like: > > OLD: > A mechanism, > similar to as described in [I-D.weis-gdoi-mac-tek] can be used to > distribute group keys to a group of ISes in Level-1 area or Level-2 > domain, using GDOI as specified in [RFC6407]. > > NEW: > A mechanism is needed to distribute group keys to a group of ISes > in a Level-1 area or Level-2 domain, using the Group Domain of > Interpretation (GDOI) protocol as specified in [RFC6407]. An example > policy and payload format was described in [I-D.weis-gdoi-mac-tek]. > > Regards > Brian >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Brian E Carpenter