Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 24 September 2012 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213D721F87ED for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.306, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YE9rWrTEhRJ for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com (ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com [23.21.227.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA53C21F87E3 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-217-126-210.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.217.126.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA8920200; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 06BE2414A; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <CAHBDyN47odOrCTLcOKG08RA82Ex7-R_DsgqGJ7=3+M26Zzt2Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN47odOrCTLcOKG08RA82Ex7-R_DsgqGJ7=3+M26Zzt2Sw@mail.gmail.com> (Mary Barnes's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:30:12 -0500")
Message-ID: <tsl1uhr76n2.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:01:12 -0000
>>>>> "Mary" == Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> writes: Mary> Minor Issue: ------------ Mary> Section 11, next to last paragraph, last sentence: "The value Mary> for this padata item should be empty." Mary> Is this really a "should" or is a MUST more appropriate? If Mary> it's a "should" then the cases whereby the item is not empty Mary> appropriate should be defined. it's a future extensibility thing. MUST send empty, MUSt ignore contents on receive might be a better way to say this.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerbe… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review: draft-ietf-krb-wg-k… Sam Hartman