IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 27 January 2014 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C1A1A011C; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHW3abtXXyK3; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22a.google.com (mail-ea0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5FD1A0117; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k10so2158064eaj.15 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:34:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:thread-index:content-language; bh=+S8C2s6/5BP+rxt5uSY2LO/pOQpHBE7+wBsaMf6Dvb4=; b=MGGEpDsocD/kKDZg8xNqzj+U7OndgZ5O8Oe4Y/VvNDhMouODwJ14dNECCVVzGLvjZf sc+meBMwjCAXkkC/MZsttdauerUtxplw9KCQpt+/1sNcNW8uIZ/EzO1qsgKBzkuRup28 cRDzHyxqKn81zLtiuFGf27K730pW5FvLRY9VPXO+l/ZBq5ZlgVHnF9cu8uX4nj9ZhSh8 g4PwHwSeUwssPjZQ0C1jlSOT8dWBpgVB6HXm3JwDM0lxA7ErQBt+MBns+KNlZF8TjDv1 Bb0zne/Ba/hxmlxIzEy5D++Ci/PVqprdMixognvBWpd95MBP3aGOi62F79jkGTHIxR33 jOdA==
X-Received: by 10.14.95.2 with SMTP id o2mr20122125eef.69.1390815298175; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:34:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniE ([109.66.49.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm40083434eex.19.2014.01.27.01.34.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:34:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, draft-ietf-pcp-description-option.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <02db01cf1a6e$62eb8280$28c28780$@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F4736082C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F4736082C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:31:08 +0200
Message-ID: <033d01cf1b42$854c10e0$8fe432a0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_033E_01CF1B53.48D64070"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQF6/p6mIwEjavahOcoGuw0nlckk9wI8szcDmy6g4DA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:35:05 -0000

Hi Med, 

Inline

Roni

 

From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com] 
Sent: 27 January, 2014 10:31 AM
To: Roni Even; draft-ietf-pcp-description-option.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03

 

Dear Roni,

Thank you for the review. 

Please see inline.

Cheers,

Med

De : Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : dimanche 26 janvier 2014 09:13
À : draft-ietf-pcp-description-option.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc : ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Objet : Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2014–1-26

IETF LC End Date: 2014–2-4

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

1.       I am not sure what the use of the “description” option is. I can
see how to create one but as for usage the only text I can see is “Querying
the PCP server to get the description text of an existing mapping is out of
scope.” I think that the document should provide information about the
purpose of this option.

[Med] The main usage is for a user to associate a textual description with a
mapping. This is captured by this text “   This option can be used by a user
(or an application) to indicate a

   description associated with a given mapping such as "FTP server", "My

   remote access to my CP router", "Camera", "Network attached storage

   serve", etc.

”

[Roni Even] This is motivation but it is not clear why the user does it if
no one can see it or does anything with it. It is kept on the server but not
used by anyone?

 

Nits/editorial comments:

1.	The IANA section should provide enough information to fill the
registry
http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcp-parameters/pcp-parameters.xml#options 

[Med] Required information as per RFC6887 is provided in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcp-description-option-03#section-2. 

[Roni Even] So section 5 should point to the definition is section 2

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email