Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

[Stig Venaas <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Brian. I have now submitted revision 04 that I believe
takes care of your issues. See below.

On 1/17/2011 5:23 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Please see attached review.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-pim-registry-03-carpenter.txt
>
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2011-01-18
> IETF LC End Date: 2011-01-25
> IESG Telechat date:
>
> Summary: Ready
> --------
>
> Editorial:
> ----------
>
> Please expand "PIM" when first used.

It has now been added to the list of abbreviations that don't
need to be expanded, so I decided to leave it as is.

>    ** Downref: Normative reference to an Experimental RFC: RFC 3973
>
> You could make this an Informative reference; you have
> only set the bar at IETF Review, not Standards Action.

I have now made the references informative.

In addition I've listed the unassigned types, and added the sentence:

The message type is a 4-bit integer with possible values from 0 to 15.

Stig