Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-arch-22

[Roni Even <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. I think it may be good to reflect your response in the document for completeness.
Roni 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart W. Card [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 9:58 AM
> To: Roni Even; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-arch-22
> 
> Thanks for the review! I was asked to respond to your question. I agree that
> GEN-7 and GEN-10 may be conspicuous by their absence from the architecture
> document.
> 
> In the initial context of Broadcast RID, GEN-7 (QoS) is a requirement primarily on
> implementations of UAS RID senders that requires no explicit architectural
> support. For example: CAAs may require a minimum rate at which RID
> information is refreshed; in any sender implementation intended for use in
> multiple jurisdictions (or on multiple classes of
> aircraft) with different rate requirements, this would thus need to be a
> configurable parameter; however it need not be remotely configurable, thus
> there is no need to specify a protocol or language for getting/setting the
> parameter value. As Network RID matures, GEN-7 may assume broader
> significance, but we don't want to embed any guesses as to that in the current
> architectural overview. GEN-10 (multicast) is even more Network RID specific,
> so likewise to be addressed in future DRIP documents.
> 
> Do you feel that the above information should be reflected explicitly in the
> architecture document?
> 
> On 4/5/2022 4:07 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
> > the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
> > any other last call comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-drip-arch-??
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> > Review Date: 2022-04-05
> > IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-06
> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> >
> > Summary:
> > The document is ready for publication as an informational RFC
> >
> > One question: I noticed that the document relates to RFC9153 requirements. I
> > did not see gen-7 and gen-10 addressed .   Gen-7 QoS: DRIP MUST enable
> > policy-based specification of performance and reliability parameters.
> >
> > Major issues:
> >
> > Minor issues:
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> >
> >
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> Stuart W. Card, PhD, Principal Engineer
> AX Enterprize, LLC  www.axenterprize.com
> 4947 Commercial Drive, Yorkville NY 13495
> 592 Hangar Road, Rome NY 13441