Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
"Ahmad Muhanna" <amuhanna@nortel.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 20:26 UTC
Return-Path: <AMUHANNA@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956DA28C0FC; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKm96+dH9bLk; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694DB3A67D2; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.71]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n92KQmi08514; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:26:48 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:25:56 -0500
Message-ID: <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2078386F@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2FDE2EA-C7A8-41FD-AEE5-041E7B1E22C9@nostrum.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
Thread-Index: AcpDmR67GG4OXLzfRt6+XAJxS2CFZAAAz4Mg
References: <5D6C0FF6-7B89-42D3-A8FF-FA5177585825@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E20008DDA@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <31684C7B-E11F-4EC2-BFBC-89A92E64141C@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2024F768@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <C51BF7B4-FB47-4B35-9355-F54CF4FEDA33@estacado.net> <C2FDE2EA-C7A8-41FD-AEE5-041E7B1E22C9@nostrum.com>
From: Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@nortel.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, pyegani@juniper.net, sgundave@cisco.com, Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, Mohamed Khalil <mkhalil@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:26:00 -0000
Thank you Ben for reviewing and taking the time to go through the document once more! Agreed; Sorry, I missed that one. I will make sure it is included in the next revision. I am sure you are okay not to spin another revision unless this is the only outstanding comment. Thanks again! Regards, Ahmad > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com] > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:47 PM > To: Muhanna, Ahmad (RICH1:2H10) > Cc: Khalil, Mohamed (RICH2:2S20); sgundave@cisco.com; > kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com; pyegani@juniper.net; General > Area Review Team; IETF-Discussion list; Jari Arkko; > marcelo@it.uc3m.es; Julien Laganier > Subject: Followup on Gen-ART review of > draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and > Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10) > > Hi, > > This is a followup of my Gen-ART review of > draft-ietf-mext-binding- revocation, updated based on > revision 13 of that draft. > > This revision addresses all of my substantive issues, and > most of the editorial issues. I had one outstanding minor > editorial comment where the author proposed a specific > change, but that change did not make it into revision 13 as > far as I can tell: > > >> > >> -- Section 11, (InitMINDelayBRIs) (I think I commented on > this, but > >> can't find the resolution) > >> > >> Did you intend for the _default_ to be a range (between .5 and 1 > >> sec), or did you mean to say the default was 1 second, and it must > >> not be configured to less than .5 seconds? I suspect the > latter, but > >> it's not clear from the text. > > > > [Ahmad] > > Sure, will fix this as follows: > > > > Initial Minimum Delay Between BRI messages (InitMINDelayBRIs) > > > > This variable specifies the initial delay timeout in seconds > > before the revoking mobility entity retransmits a BRI message. > > The default is 1 second but not to be configured less than 0.5 > > seconds. > > Revision 13 still appears to have the old text. > > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [DISCUSS + Gen-ART] Review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-iet… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft… Ben Campbell