Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 20:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0046F3A68C2; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSKO4zCucrKh; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2233A68B3; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.213] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n92KhquC077739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:43:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2078386F@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:43:52 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3FF28907-FE92-45A5-8880-E87A49EFA378@nostrum.com>
References: <5D6C0FF6-7B89-42D3-A8FF-FA5177585825@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E20008DDA@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <31684C7B-E11F-4EC2-BFBC-89A92E64141C@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2024F768@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <C51BF7B4-FB47-4B35-9355-F54CF4FEDA33@estacado.net> <C2FDE2EA-C7A8-41FD-AEE5-041E7B1E22C9@nostrum.com> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2078386F@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
To: Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@nortel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, pyegani@juniper.net, sgundave@cisco.com, kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, Mohamed Khalil <mkhalil@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:42:30 -0000
On Oct 2, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote: > > Thank you Ben for reviewing and taking the time to go through the > document once more! > Agreed; Sorry, I missed that one. > > I will make sure it is included in the next revision. I am sure you > are > okay not to spin another revision unless this is the only outstanding > comment. Yes, no problem. That one could be done as an editor note (or not at all, really--it's pretty minor.) > > Thanks again! > > Regards, > Ahmad > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:47 PM >> To: Muhanna, Ahmad (RICH1:2H10) >> Cc: Khalil, Mohamed (RICH2:2S20); sgundave@cisco.com; >> kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com; pyegani@juniper.net; General >> Area Review Team; IETF-Discussion list; Jari Arkko; >> marcelo@it.uc3m.es; Julien Laganier >> Subject: Followup on Gen-ART review of >> draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and >> Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10) >> >> Hi, >> >> This is a followup of my Gen-ART review of >> draft-ietf-mext-binding- revocation, updated based on >> revision 13 of that draft. >> >> This revision addresses all of my substantive issues, and >> most of the editorial issues. I had one outstanding minor >> editorial comment where the author proposed a specific >> change, but that change did not make it into revision 13 as >> far as I can tell: >> >>>> >>>> -- Section 11, (InitMINDelayBRIs) (I think I commented on >> this, but >>>> can't find the resolution) >>>> >>>> Did you intend for the _default_ to be a range (between .5 and 1 >>>> sec), or did you mean to say the default was 1 second, and it must >>>> not be configured to less than .5 seconds? I suspect the >> latter, but >>>> it's not clear from the text. >>> >>> [Ahmad] >>> Sure, will fix this as follows: >>> >>> Initial Minimum Delay Between BRI messages (InitMINDelayBRIs) >>> >>> This variable specifies the initial delay timeout in seconds >>> before the revoking mobility entity retransmits a BRI message. >>> The default is 1 second but not to be configured less than 0.5 >>> seconds. >> >> Revision 13 still appears to have the old text. >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ben. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-II] Gen-ART LC and Telechat R… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Re… Ben Campbell
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of d… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] [DISCUSS + Gen-ART] Review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-iet… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft… Ahmad Muhanna
- Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft… Ben Campbell