Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0046F3A68C2; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSKO4zCucrKh; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2233A68B3; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.213] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n92KhquC077739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:43:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2078386F@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:43:52 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3FF28907-FE92-45A5-8880-E87A49EFA378@nostrum.com>
References: <5D6C0FF6-7B89-42D3-A8FF-FA5177585825@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E20008DDA@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <31684C7B-E11F-4EC2-BFBC-89A92E64141C@estacado.net> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2024F768@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <C51BF7B4-FB47-4B35-9355-F54CF4FEDA33@estacado.net> <C2FDE2EA-C7A8-41FD-AEE5-041E7B1E22C9@nostrum.com> <C5A96676FCD00745B64AE42D5FCC9B6E2078386F@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
To: Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@nortel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, pyegani@juniper.net, sgundave@cisco.com, kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, Mohamed Khalil <mkhalil@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:42:30 -0000

On Oct 2, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:

>
> Thank you Ben for reviewing and taking the time to go through the
> document once more!
> Agreed; Sorry, I missed that one.
>
> I will make sure it is included in the next revision. I am sure you  
> are
> okay not to spin another revision unless this is the only outstanding
> comment.

Yes, no problem. That one could be done as an editor note (or not at  
all, really--it's pretty minor.)

>
> Thanks again!
>
> Regards,
> Ahmad
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:47 PM
>> To: Muhanna, Ahmad (RICH1:2H10)
>> Cc: Khalil, Mohamed (RICH2:2S20); sgundave@cisco.com;
>> kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com; pyegani@juniper.net; General
>> Area Review Team; IETF-Discussion list; Jari Arkko;
>> marcelo@it.uc3m.es; Julien Laganier
>> Subject: Followup on Gen-ART review of
>> draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and
>> Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a followup of my Gen-ART review of
>> draft-ietf-mext-binding- revocation, updated based on
>> revision 13 of that draft.
>>
>> This revision addresses all of my substantive issues, and
>> most of the editorial issues. I had one outstanding minor
>> editorial comment where the author proposed a specific
>> change, but that change did not make it into revision 13 as
>> far as I can tell:
>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Section 11, (InitMINDelayBRIs) (I think I commented on 
>> this, but
>>>> can't find the resolution)
>>>>
>>>> Did you intend for the _default_ to be a range (between .5 and 1
>>>> sec), or did you mean to say the default was 1 second, and it must
>>>> not be configured to less than .5 seconds? I suspect the
>> latter, but
>>>> it's not clear from the text.
>>>
>>> [Ahmad]
>>> Sure, will fix this as follows:
>>>
>>>  Initial Minimum Delay Between BRI messages (InitMINDelayBRIs)
>>>
>>>     This variable specifies the initial delay timeout in seconds
>>>     before the revoking mobility entity retransmits a BRI message.
>>>     The default is 1 second but not to be configured less than 0.5
>>> seconds.
>>
>> Revision 13 still appears to have the old text.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ben.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art