Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02
"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Thu, 23 July 2020 17:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD5B3A0BF6 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.267, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-KQ1UeSQ9-e for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B073A0BF5 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 06NHRRJs052921; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 06NHRRGR052920; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202007231727.06NHRRGR052920@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <AD5E4BB6-409E-4BAC-8EF4-8B97F4B29A7E@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:27:27 -0700
CC: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/_MlIdkAcxDY_J2fR3glRmtjI3TU>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:27:40 -0000
> > I'm happy to start talking about that now in addition to at our meeting next week. > > What do you think about asking the IAB to start an inclusivity program? I think the idea is OK, but the what you called it is the wrong tone, inclusivity is not what should be done here, what should be done is the reduction of exclusivity. Inclusivity is an unbounded problem, reduction of exclusivity is fairly well bounded. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
- [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-03 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Nick Doty
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-knodel-terminology-02 Keith Moore