IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geojson] PR #199: CRS

Martin Daly <Martin.Daly@cadcorp.com> Wed, 27 April 2016 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Daly@cadcorp.com>
X-Original-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geojson@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903D312B01B for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hoc6FEt1ZM15 for <geojson@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tokyo.mep.pandasecurity.com (tokyo.mep.pandasecurity.com [92.54.22.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4BE12B027 for <geojson@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [82.110.183.162] (helo=DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net) by tokyo.mep.pandasecurity.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Martin.Daly@cadcorp.com>) id 1avItT-0001fw-QB; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:24:16 +0200
Received: from DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net (10.0.1.3) by DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net (10.0.1.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:27:20 +0100
Received: from DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net ([::1]) by DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net ([::1]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:27:20 +0100
X-Envelope-From: Martin.Daly@cadcorp.com
From: Martin Daly <Martin.Daly@cadcorp.com>
To: 'Erik Wilde' <erik.wilde@dret.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Geojson] PR #199: CRS
Thread-Index: AQHRm32trdTN+coVlUeuAYiFN8fcK5+T+p7wgAKNE4CAABUqAIAABF+AgAAfaQCABHbYAIAAkaGQgACiuQCAAE45AIAAGMQwgABPRgCAAAhBgIAAOirA
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 06:27:20 +0000
Message-ID: <e0329b62f21e4bf1ac8b288f121aa267@DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net>
References: <CABkgnnWUzLhitZkqahnk-EMwcp5LXS6+=-oUOkd6nzOTjRJEpA@mail.gmail.com> <6784219190a64d97b571b2edb28918be@DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net> <CAOodmJq7a6OsCuyk9TegjwhK3wP4xD4NRer0aB611wYshE_A9g@mail.gmail.com> <7a9afbd53cd844af816bea333155e2e6@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au> <953D1714-8C55-4F1F-83C5-D93DEE8A5E8F@intl-interfaces.com> <CAJcQiLfmpjk2CMQ9Oe217HmLo_J3do0OZ60R0R-8Px-DiH6KVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOodmJqpTSsik79GAEhvHbP=sn7gmgRNVViWv8+_cGHx1Gd-6g@mail.gmail.com> <b11da96f44cb41d59b84a3e2395eaa1f@DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net> <57F0CA73-B9BF-43E6-8EF8-313D166213B2@hobu.co> <CAOodmJredpkTzjKTvjxiLtuCiJpNkvcKOmPkkP0ucA9rhRaf4Q@mail.gmail.com> <e518176aaeb14d5f964d07159029c3d5@DEV003VEX.cadcorp.net> <CABkgnnXHgbd1-m496n9qSTc9ZgHe8bxvccM+9sxKryRwNKa_gg@mail.gmail.com> <8a29702e-bec7-5bd3-f83a-3df8e495471e@dret.net>
In-Reply-To: <8a29702e-bec7-5bd3-f83a-3df8e495471e@dret.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [77.103.214.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geojson/hL7CG7Hx3_O0m-uhqFJBCLujcwg>
Cc: "geojson@ietf.org" <geojson@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geojson] PR #199: CRS
X-BeenThere: geojson@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF GeoJSON WG <geojson.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geojson/>
List-Post: <mailto:geojson@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geojson>, <mailto:geojson-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 06:24:25 -0000

> On 2016-04-26 20:28, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > Is there any way we can say that such data is not *this* GeoJSON, it's
> > that other GeoJSON.  Maybe by declaring this GeoJSON v2?
> 
> there is a different media type. in theory, that should be enough to allow
> people to distinguish between old and new rules. in practice it probably won't
> work like this, though.

There's a big bad world out there that isn't on the web, so this isn't enough.

Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email