Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Sun, 12 July 2009 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9EF3A6AB0 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mI5NNZljlYWf for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com (nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.12.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39C43A6A2D for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,387,1243828800"; d="scan'208";a="166948041"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2009 10:52:51 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2009 10:52:50 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:52:37 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04018473A4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <187101ca02d4$c35ffad0$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan
thread-index: AcoC1MKX7Gi2dobiSZO+ZmxVGNSzHQAK3AVA
References: <187101ca02d4$c35ffad0$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:52:23 -0000

These changes seem fine, and will allow me clearing the DISCUSS as soon
as the new version is submitted. 

Thank you for addressing my concerns. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:40 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan
> 
> Hi Dan, 
> 
> Regarding your DISCUSS:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-l
cp-ps/comment/
97878/

[IESG Evaluation DISCUSS]
1. Since this document was written IEEE 802.1AB was approved and
deployed. I suggest the following change in Section 5:

OLD:

Switch/Port Number:

      This identifier is available only in certain networks, such as
      enterprise networks, typically available via proprietary protocols
      like CDP or, in the future, 802.1ab.

NEW:

Ethernet Switch (Bridge)/Port Number:

      This identifier is available only in certain networks, such as
      enterprise networks, typically available via the IEEE 802.1AB
      protocol [xx] or proprietary protocols like the Cisco Discovery
      Protocol (CDP) [yy]

Adding informative references would also be nice for IEEE 802.1AB and
CDP would also be useful.

[xx] IEEE 802.1AB-2005 IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area
Networks Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery -
http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1AB-2005.pdf

Somebody should be able to provide a reference to CDP.


[hannes] Fixed. 

2. The four requirements in the Security Considerations section deserve
to be written with 2119 capitalized MUST.

[hannes] Fixed. 

Regarding your COMMENT:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps/comm
ent/
97879/

There are plenty of acronyms not expanded at the first occurence: USB,
DSL, PPoE, etc.

[hannes] Good point. Fixed. 

A new version can be found here: 
http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/svn/draft-tschofenig-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps/dra
ft-i
etf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-10.txt

Ciao
Hannes