[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps COMMENT by Alexey
"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 12 July 2009 09:37 UTC
Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5A53A6A31 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pO2K9YoKlTcl for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D34DA3A6951 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2009 09:38:17 -0000
Received: from a91-154-108-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO 4FIL42860) [91.154.108.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 11:38:17 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ciK5XPIVcDA6e9UWEG7ynoHTmOKVEiSHgSewzIP R1D23dpJvo66+C
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: 'Alexey Melnikov' <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:40:36 +0300
Message-ID: <187301ca02d4$cf4bbcd0$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcoC1KRMoi/EyvlsRy+k3tWCukOWKA==
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.63
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps COMMENT by Alexey
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:37:50 -0000
Hi Alexey, Regarding your COMMENT: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps/comment/ 97646/ In Section 6: The following requirements and assumptions have been identified: Requirement L7-1: Identifier Choice The L7 LCP MUST be able to carry different identifiers or MUST define an identifier that is mandatory to implement. Did you mean "identifier type" here? Regarding the latter aspect, such an identifier is only appropriate if it is from the same realm as the one for which the location information service maintains identifier to location mapping. [hannes] Now, since the protocol itself is already in IESG review I can be somewhat precise about the identifier being used. In HELD http://tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery/ the identifier is the IP address. In http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-held-measurements-04.txt additional identifiers have been proposed. Ciao Hannes
- [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps COMMENT by… Hannes Tschofenig