Re: [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00
Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> Tue, 12 February 2013 21:03 UTC
Return-Path: <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FD921F8C03 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:03:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRMqTk9sEXTm for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:03:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mail.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFF121F8C00 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:03:04 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version; b=bQ/8oXktrio5fwNaY6g4OPnZ4zmTxrhEYEFPqbZ7H/4UzttTe1HpryRd 9ECJMnHnKJlN1HPodOuugcuWAthq8zE0xK7xGGw9LnFKpWx5+ZScAIIch JyfbcAdCB22g3/N;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1360702984; x=1392238984; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Ray=20Bellis=20<Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> |Subject:=20Re:=20[Geopriv]=20AD=20Review:=20draft-ietf-g eopriv-flow-identity-00|Date:=20Tue,=2012=20Feb=202013=20 21:03:00=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<53F00E5CD8B2E34C81C0C89EB 0B4FE73104F9A6C@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk>|To:=20GEOPR IV=20WG=20<geopriv@ietf.org>|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<1402FD0AF1FEC34C83BE7E220A02E4CD@okna.nom inet.org.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<CABkgnnVDw9+j7Zu+tF=3DhAdJWe yRKGyT8=3DmvBLW8mnX4NaDQKhQ@mail.gmail.com>|References: =20<511A799F.8040607@nostrum.com>=0D=0A=20<CABkgnnVDw9+j7 Zu+tF=3DhAdJWeyRKGyT8=3DmvBLW8mnX4NaDQKhQ@mail.gmail.com>; bh=bzM2l1h/Dd6Dxq87uMQRVVqeZDu9Ip6HCe3iLJDkIIg=; b=O95ivwEdx892IvAT7PQC3CTWgp6Lskjsu8uh8D0EN9h7Vldr3SgVf5X5 BFEbgP/ryPSDnH0Jo6QEA4fZ9N18Vm4SKcg/CYud4rL+21IK6jTRJ/3dm KOvk5qtsMd62omV;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,652,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="38357997"
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2013 21:03:01 +0000
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%17]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:03:01 +0000
From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
To: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00
Thread-Index: AQHOCUUhIOH78Iw9rE2ITKAw65/W4ph2giiAgAA0A4A=
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:03:00 +0000
Message-ID: <53F00E5CD8B2E34C81C0C89EB0B4FE73104F9A6C@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk>
References: <511A799F.8040607@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnVDw9+j7Zu+tF=hAdJWeyRKGyT8=mvBLW8mnX4NaDQKhQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVDw9+j7Zu+tF=hAdJWeyRKGyT8=mvBLW8mnX4NaDQKhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1402FD0AF1FEC34C83BE7E220A02E4CD@okna.nominet.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-00
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:03:08 -0000
On 12 Feb 2013, at 17:56, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > This is reasonable. There is a statement deprecating ports at the end > of Section 3. At a minimum, that could be moved up. > > Highlighting the limited applicability of port is sufficient, and the > draft could be more definite on this point. Moving this to the > introduction might make this clear. > > """Given the limited applicability of using IP and port for > identification, the port number elements from Section 3.3 of [RFC6155] > are deprecated and MUST NOT be used. Flow identity provides a more > generally applicable means of identifying devices behind NAT > devices.""" > > Then I think that we can justify the "updates" clause. Thanks Robert for the comments, and Martin for the suggested text. I'll incorporate this (or something very similar to it, given that this needs to blend nicely with paragraph 2 of the introduction) and rev the document shortly. thanks, Ray
- [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-iden… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Geopriv] AD Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-… Ray Bellis