IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 April 2008 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-geopriv-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27213A6B5F; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5D628C112 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7+zhphnepTh for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFA728C2BD for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.232] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m3TGIItY004470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:18:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-Id: <687BA2DE-8669-4392-8F3D-37B50EAC3549@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240602c43cf945059f@[24.4.239.115]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:18:18 -0500
References: <48173316.6000903@gmx.net> <B90FB430-16C8-47C6-B2FE-CF3B09533FFA@nostrum.com> <p06240600c43cea6b9b55@[24.4.239.115]> <A11659A9-821B-4731-9EA2-30B8ED8571BC@nostrum.com> <p06240602c43cf945059f@[24.4.239.115]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93/6802/Wed Apr 16 12:35:44 2008 on shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org

I don't object to proceeding this way. If anyone here does, speak up  
now.

RjS

On Apr 29, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> At 8:16 AM -0700 4/29/08, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> (Typing based on memory rather than looking at notes - if memory has
>> drifted from reality don't hesitate to correct me).
>>
>> Hadn't planned on it, but if you feel that's the most appropriate
>> thing to do, let me know.
>> I was expecting the draft to be ephemeral and its contents captured
>> for the long run in other documents.
>> Do you think it should be published on its own?
>>
>> RjS
>
> I think the key thing that Keith Drage wants is a strong sense
> that this is GeoPriv's consensus and that he can count on it not  
> changing.
> I think making it a geopriv working group document helps
> bolster that sense; if we have to, we can then ask for informational
> status and publish it.  As  you say, it may turn out that
> some other form of consensus call will do, but that's the  usual
> way something gets declared to be the consensus of a group.
>
> 				Ted
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>>
>>> At 7:49 AM -0700 4/29/08, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>>> We are waiting on a revised draft from Jon capturing those
>>>> conversations (who I will re-ping).
>>>> We will make a GEOPRIV consensus call on that draft and pass the
>>>> result to SIP.
>>>>
>>>> RjS
>>>
>>> Do you want the revised draft to be submitted as draft-geopriv- ?
>>>
>>>                              Ted
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I might be wrong but my previous query stopped at the point  
>>>>> where we
>>>>> spoke about the next steps.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, who is going to write a summary of the discussion we had at  
>>>>> the
>>>>> last
>>>>> IETF meeting?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email