Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance

(Typing based on memory rather than looking at notes - if memory has  
drifted from reality don't hesitate to correct me).

Hadn't planned on it, but if you feel that's the most appropriate  
thing to do, let me know.
I was expecting the draft to be ephemeral and its contents captured  
for the long run in other documents.
Do you think it should be published on its own?

RjS

On Apr 29, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> At 7:49 AM -0700 4/29/08, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> We are waiting on a revised draft from Jon capturing those
>> conversations (who I will re-ping).
>> We will make a GEOPRIV consensus call on that draft and pass the
>> result to SIP.
>>
>> RjS
>
> Do you want the revised draft to be submitted as draft-geopriv- ?
>
> 				Ted
>
>
>
>
>> On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>>
>>> I might be wrong but my previous query stopped at the point where we
>>> spoke about the next steps.
>>>
>>> So, who is going to write a summary of the discussion we had at the
>>> last
>>> IETF meeting?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv