Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Sun, 26 July 2009 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365B73A6AF2 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icnvhkA1FANt for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F2D3A6ACB for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlwGAOBsbEqrR7MV/2dsb2JhbACIR64jiCiNWAWEDQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,273,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="354322706"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2009 21:53:44 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6QLrjW8030448; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:45 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6QLrjjQ029629; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:53:45 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:44 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.89.9.91]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:42 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:53:27 -0500
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, "'Thomson, Martin'" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, geopriv@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <02f901ca06c6$6ab2bb70$0301a8c0@nsnintra.net>
References: <017d01ca0525$c2102fd0$1116a20a@nsnintra.net> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF10608AEB6@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <02f901ca06c6$6ab2bb70$0301a8c0@nsnintra.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212LFQG101s00009d83@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2009 21:53:43.0681 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B52F710:01CA0E3B]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=4179; t=1248645225; x=1249509225; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Geopriv]=20Another=20Update=20to=0A=20 =20draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt |Sender:=20; bh=jwl7UaYNph1ccjY4A0ov8xKrYHGBSiF/BQGv6VUCmb4=; b=kKS8D4CTih6kYYPLVr3iUC74cQ6jbF2/0j3viFSuVPG06YyzXVQlK1CUgb OHoMm0o67vQ4e70+xu9Q87n0WW7Pk3fI6L3i3eqpwhuLcUH06KMbizHVjAY+ VCstnyhjJ92zEQkpbVwTp+4Qq+oepSFG1xRGeTEGvG8T8dpRUnaQg=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:53:45 -0000

At 05:07 AM 7/17/2009, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>Hi Martin,
>
> >Thanks Hannes,
> >
> >responseTime is a bit of a concern.
> >
> >At a minimum, responseTime is a separate item from
> >locationType.  That will simplify your description a little.
>
>
>Since there is no top level XML element I could only define it as a separate
>XML element. That's fine but I believe it does not change a lot.
>
> >More seriously: I'm not entirely sure how to interpret
> >responseTime in the context of a SIP PA.  This might work as
> >you have described, but I would suggest that it complicates
> >things considerably.  There's discussion on this point in my
> >draft here:
> >
> ><http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-simple-cont-presence->val 
> -req-02#section-4.6.1.1>
> >
> >I don't know how to solve this problem yet.
> >
>
>I am not sure I see the problems.
>
>Imagine a SIP proxy receives a SIP message with an LbyR and wants to
>retrieve location information for routing. Depending on the URI scheme (HTTP
>vs. SIP) he would either use
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-deref-protocol-03.txt
>Or
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-04.txt

I'm confused.

For SIP, why would the filters doc be used when Conveyance already 
has how a server dereferences a location URI for routing?

This isn't a soliciting action requiring filters.


>For
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-deref-protocol-03.txt he
>could use the 'responseTime' attribute set to "emergencyRouting".
>
>When a 'responseTime' attribute is used with
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-04.txt
>then hopefully the semantic would be the same. Instead of returning location
>information that is good for dispatch location information usable for
>routing would be returned.
>
>Ciao
>Hannes
>
> >--Martin
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 July 2009 6:25 PM
> >> To: geopriv@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-
> >> 05.txt
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Here is another update to
> >draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt based
> >> on the feedback from Martin. The changes are:
> >>
> >> * added the <locationType> element (including the 'exact' and
> >> 'responseTime'
> >> attribute). I re-used the text from the HELD specification and
> >> modified as appropriately.
> >> * fixed the civic prefix in the example (again)
> >> * modified the schema to pick up the suggestion regarding
> >the <moved>
> >> and the <enterOrExit> element.
> >>
> >> The new document is here:
> >> http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/svn/Filters/draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-
> >> filters-05.
> >> txt
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Hannes
> >>
> >> PS: When including the text about <locationType> element two issues
> >> that might need to get discussed, namely the ability to
> >carry multiple
> >> PIDF- Los (or to include multiple representations of the location in
> >> the same
> >> PIDF-LO)
> >> in a NOTIFY and the need to define some error messages
> >(e.g., to tell
> >> the Notifier that the requested locationType is actually not
> >> available).
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Geopriv mailing list
> >> Geopriv@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >---------------------------------
> >This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> >contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> >If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> >immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> >this email is prohibited.
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >---------------------------------
> >[mf2]
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv