Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Platforms in DSL wholesale inCanada
"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 09 August 2009 06:59 UTC
Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA213A6835 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.954, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iia1XyrWR--y for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF9D13A67C2 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Aug 2009 06:58:49 -0000
Received: from a91-154-108-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO 4FIL42860) [91.154.108.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp059) with SMTP; 09 Aug 2009 08:58:49 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/h/KhMXArhKJw+s3ZiDJsrP3K3+go1Q3NjiQCdhy 91u+qhIpJMwE9N
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: 'Francois Menard' <fmenard@xittel.net>, 'ecrit' <ecrit@ietf.org>, geopriv@ietf.org
References: <36E6ED93-ACE3-4AD2-A7FF-ACF11D5D5007@xittel.net><E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF104A34473@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <826C0AAE-B404-4797-91BB-0C694C76B63B@xittel.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:01:22 +0300
Message-ID: <011801ca18bf$34a502d0$be5ca20a@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <826C0AAE-B404-4797-91BB-0C694C76B63B@xittel.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcoYhoFzhkd4/pQmRaS7iZg4WuT51wAOC2fw
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.57
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Platforms in DSL wholesale inCanada
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 06:59:38 -0000
Hi Francois, >Q. is HELD meant to be used as a PIDF-LO carrying protocol >between two LISes and is there any standards track work done >at the IETF to make this happen? A: The LIS-to-LIS communication is provided by the usage of http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-extensions -09.txt http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-geopriv-held-measurements-04 For a bit more background there is another document: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-lis2lis-bcp-00 Ciao Hannes > >F. > >On 8-Aug-09, at 7:20 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote: > >> Francois, >> >> Why do you think that this mailing list has any more insight >into this >> than you do? >> Why don't you simply ask the ILECs what they mean? >> >> Regards >> James >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Francois Menard >> Sent: Sat 8/8/2009 10:39 AM >> To: ecrit >> Subject: [Ecrit] Location Determination Platforms in DSL >wholesale in >> Canada >> >> >> In yesterday's submission to the CRTC, the ILECs have submitted the >> following: >> >> --- >> For wholesale, the ILEC LDP will interact with the Wholesale ISP by >> responding to HELD location requests at the IP address >assignment time >> by the Wholesale ISP. >> >> The Wholesale ISP will be responsible to update the ILEC LIS >> accordingly and in a timely fashion. >> ---- >> >> This language is very confusing to me. >> >> Does this mean that we are enabling LIS to LIS >communications via HELD >> ? >> >> Question to the group: >> >> 1) What forms the query of the ISP into the ILEC LDP? >> >> 2) What forms the response of the ILEC LDP to the Wholesale >ISP inside >> the HELD location request? >> >> 3) What forms the push update of the Wholesale ISP into the ILEC LIS? >> >> I have my suspicion that the ILEC has just devised a PIDF-LO >carrying >> protocol in the form of HELD based on a L2TP AAA data >atypical of DSL >> wholesale. >> >> Your enlightments will be great as the ILEC submission is mute on >> this. >> >> F. >> >> -- >> Francois Menard >> fmenard@xittel.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ecrit mailing list >> Ecrit@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > >Francois Menard >fmenard@xittel.net > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ecrit mailing list >Ecrit@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Francois Menard
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Francois Menard
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Francois Menard
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Plat… Francois Menard